My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
JAWRA article - Rain Gardens
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
DayForward
>
JAWRA article - Rain Gardens
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2009 7:51:12 AM
Creation date
12/15/2009 4:10:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
General OWC
Title
Performance Assessment on Rain Gardens
Date
12/15/2009
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Reports
Supplemental fields
Drought Mitigation - Doc Type
News Article
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF RAIN GARDENS <br />mottles (i.e., small areas of gray, red, yellow, brown, <br />or black that differ in color from the bulk soil), which <br />may indicate hydric soils (Richardson and Vepraskas, <br />2001) that would be associated with prolonged water <br />saturation. The soil was crumbled and repacked into <br />the core hole after soil inspection was complete. <br />Infiltration Rate Tests <br />equation for cumulative infiltration, i(t), using the <br />geometry of a spherical cap with a height of <br />R(t) + Lmax and soil with an initial and final moisture <br />content of 0 and 0 respectively, is: <br />i(t) = 3 ( — 0 0) ( 2 [R(t)] 3 + 3 [R(t)]�Lmax — Lmax — 4r0) <br />(1) <br />The MPD Infiltrometer (Figure 1) consists of a thin - <br />walled (2 mm thick) aluminum cylinder with a height <br />of 45 cm and an inner diameter of 10 cm. A transpar- <br />ent piezometer tube was attached to the outside of the <br />device beside a measurement tape for making water <br />level readings. After any mulch or detached/decaying <br />plant material was brushed aside the device was <br />pounded into the soil to a depth of 5 cm and then filled <br />with water to a height of 43 cm as to not overflow the <br />device. The water level over time was then recorded <br />either manually or automatically using an ultrasonic <br />sensor (1 reading /s averaged over 10 s) (MassaSonic, <br />M -5000; MASSA PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Hing- <br />ham, Massachusetts). MPD Infiltrometer measure- <br />ments were made at a number of locations throughout <br />each basin, based upon a restricted sampling grid that <br />avoided bushes, trees, and energy dissipation struc- <br />tures such as riprap or concrete, and did not otherwise <br />destroy plantings. The coordinates of each location <br />were determined using a Trimble ProXR GPS unit <br />(Trimble Navigation Limited, Sunnyvale, California), <br />which delivers submeter accuracy (accuracy varies <br />with proximity to base station) in the correct condi- <br />tions. Six MPD Infiltrometers were used at a time to <br />increase the rate of data collection. <br />The MPD Infiltrometer and the notations used in <br />the equations are illustrated in Figure 1. The original <br />Philip -Dunne permeameter technique involved placing <br />the device in a borehole. The device was therefore mod- <br />ified to incorporate surface infiltration and capture any <br />effects of sediment accumulation in the stormwater <br />BMP. Due to these modifications in the technique, the <br />methodology described by Philip (1993) for determining <br />saturated hydraulic conductivity needed to be altered <br />accordingly. This alteration included changing the <br />geometry of the source from a sphere to a hemisphere <br />and accounting for one - dimensional flow through the <br />soil contained within the bottom of the device. <br />The equations used in calculating the saturated <br />conductivity are only applied after R(t) (radius to the <br />sharp wetted front at time t) is greater than the dis- <br />tance ri + LmaX, where r is the radius of the cylin- <br />der and L a. , is the depth of insertion into the soil, <br />which can be determined from the volume of water <br />infiltrated and soil porosity. The mass conservation <br />The same analysis procedure described by Philip <br />(1993) was followed, which involves working through a <br />series of equations to solve for the two unknowns, Ksat, <br />the saturated hydraulic conductivity and � which is <br />the wetting front suction head for the unsaturated soil. <br />A computational spreadsheet procedure with the sol- <br />ver add -in and visual basic application was developed <br />to find solutions to the equations and automate the <br />computational process and obtain values ofKsat and 0. <br />For 57% of the tests, only three data points were <br />obtained manually with the times corresponding to <br />full, half - empty, and empty, as recommended by <br />Munoz - Carpena et al. (2002) for the Philip -Dunne <br />permeameter. The three -point method, however, <br />required additional data processing to meet the <br />requirements of the data fitting procedure used to <br />determine Ksat• An exponential fit of the three points <br />was used to generate the necessary water level vs. <br />time data. For the remainder of the tests, more data <br />points were obtained and the additional processing <br />was not required. A capacitance probe (Theta Probe <br />ML2x; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, Mas- <br />sachusetts), which measures the dielectric constant of <br />the soil, was used to indirectly estimate the initial <br />and final soil moisture content of the top six cm of <br />soil in the vicinity of the infiltrometer. A soil specific <br />calibration using several gravimetric soil moisture <br />measurements was also conducted for each rain gar- <br />den. Bulk density measurements, required to convert <br />gravimetric water content to volumetric water con- <br />tent, were made using the core method (Klute, 1986). <br />Tests in which there was minimal change in water <br />level over —3 -h time period were terminated, suggest- <br />ing that the Ksat value was less than the smallest <br />measured Ksat value of 5.6 x 10 -7 cm/s. The calcu- <br />lated Ksat values for each measurement location were <br />entered into ArcView to provide a map showing the <br />spatial variability in Ksat for each rain garden. <br />The arithmetic mean, geometric mean, and the med- <br />ian were then calculated for each site. Graphs of the <br />cumulative distribution of the measured Ksat values <br />along with the theoretical normal and log- normal <br />distributions for the mean and standard deviation (SD) <br />of the data collected were plotted. Visual inspection of <br />the cumulative distribution plots along with the <br />JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION 1023 JAWRA <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.