Laserfiche WebLink
JOUR OF THEAIICAN W R �, sQURC'S ASSOt�1ATl0� <br />4 <br />V1No: <br />AM ER RES S A$Sq "CIi4TION $ August'20D9 <br />< r <br />DESIGNING IMPACT ASSESSMENTS FOR EVALUATING ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS <br />OF AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION PRACTICES ON STREAMS' <br />Peter C. Smiley Jr., F. Douglas Shields Jr., and Scott S. Knight <br />ABSTRACT: Conservation practices are regularly implemented within agricultural watersheds throughout the <br />United States without evaluating their ecological impacts. Impact assessments documenting how habitat and <br />aquatic biota within streams respond to these practices are needed for evaluating the effects of conservation <br />practices. Numerous sampling protocols have been developed for monitoring streams. However, protocols <br />designed for monitoring studies are not appropriate for impact assessments. We developed guiding principles for <br />designing impact assessments of ecological responses to conservation practices. The guiding principles are as fol- <br />lows: (1) develop the hypothesis first, (2) use replicated experimental designs having controls and treatments, <br />(3) assess the habitat and biological characteristics with quantitative and repeatable sampling methods, (4) use <br />multiple sampling techniques for collecting aquatic organisms, and (5) standardize sampling efforts for aquatic <br />organisms. The guiding principles were applied in designing a study intended to evaluate the influence of herba- <br />ceous riparian buffers on channelized headwater streams in central Ohio. Our example highlights that the <br />application of our recommendations will result in impact assessments that are hypothesis- driven and incorpo- <br />rate quantitative methods for the measurement of abiotic and biotic attributes. <br />(KEY TERMS: agricultural streams; conservation practices; environmental impacts; experimental design; envi- <br />ronmental sampling; aquatic ecology; Conservation Effects Assessment Project.) <br />Smiley, Peter C., Jr., F. Douglas Shields Jr., and Scott S. Knight, 2009. Designing Impact Assessments for Eval- <br />uating Ecological Effects of Agricultural Conservation Practices on Streams. Journal of the American Water <br />Resources Association (JAWRA) 45(4):867 -878. DOI: 10 .1111/j.1752- 1688.2009.00330.x <br />INTRODUCTION <br />Conservation practices were traditionally defined <br />as methods for managing soil and water resources to <br />improve agricultural production, but the current defi- <br />nition includes methods to reduce the environmental <br />impacts of agriculture on terrestrial and aquatic eco- <br />systems (Soil and Water Conservation Society, 2001). <br />Specifically, conservation practices are land, water, <br />and agronomic management practices designed to <br />reduce erosion rates, improve water quality, and <br />restore terrestrial and aquatic habitats in agricul- <br />tural streams. Conservation tillage, riparian buffers, <br />and wetland creation are just a few examples of prac- <br />tices that have been promoted and funded through <br />various federal and state programs. Conservation <br />practices have been regularly implemented within <br />'Paper No. JAWRA -08- 0036 -P of the Journal of the American Water Resources Association ( JAWRA). Received February 21, 2008; <br />accepted January 27, 2009. © 2009 American Water Resources Association. No claim to original U.S. government works. Discussions are <br />open until six months from print publication. <br />2 Respectively, Research Ecologist (Smiley), USDA -ARS, Soil Drainage Research Unit, 590 Woody Hayes Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43210; <br />Research Hydraulic Engineer (Shields) and Research Ecologist (Knight), USDA -ARS, National Sedimentation Laboratory, P.O. Box 1157, <br />Oxford, Mississippi 38655 (E- Mail/Smiley: rocky.smiley@ars.usda.gov). <br />JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION 867 <br />JAWRA <br />