Laserfiche WebLink
DROUGHT RESILIENCE OF THE CALIFORNIA CENTRAL VALLEY SURFACE GROUND SYSTEM <br />TABLE 5. Surface Water Diversions in Base and Drought Periods. <br />Change From Base Period <br />TABLE 6. Impact of Drought on Ground -Water Pumping. <br />Change From Base Period <br />Base <br />Base <br />Severe <br />Moderate <br />Slight <br />Hydrologic <br />Periofd <br />Drought <br />Drought <br />Drought <br />Region <br />(m/year) <br />(m/year) <br />(m/year) <br />(m/year) <br />Sacramento <br />0.34 <br />-0.09 <br />-0.02 <br />0.02 <br />Eastside <br />0.005 <br />-0.003 <br />-0.002 <br />-0.002 <br />San Joaquin <br />0.35 <br />-0.15 <br />-0.07 <br />-0.06 <br />Tulare <br />0.19 <br />-0.13 <br />-0.12 <br />-0.09 <br />Central Valley <br />0.28 <br />-0.11 <br />-0.06 <br />-0.03 <br />Change( %) <br />-0.06 <br />-38% <br />-22% <br />-12% <br />TABLE 6. Impact of Drought on Ground -Water Pumping. <br />Change From Base Period <br />Base <br />Severe <br />Moderate <br />Slight <br />Hydrologic Period <br />Drought <br />Drought <br />Drought <br />Region (m/year) <br />(m/year) <br />(m/year) <br />(m/year) <br />Sacramento <br />0.06 <br />0.04 <br />0.02 <br />0.00 <br />Eastside <br />0.15 <br />0.05 <br />0.04 <br />0.02 <br />San Joaquin <br />0.13 <br />0.17 <br />0.10 <br />0.07 <br />Tulare <br />0.29 <br />0.17 <br />0.14 <br />0.07 <br />Central Valley <br />0.16 <br />0.12 <br />0.08 <br />0.04 <br />Change (%) <br />-0.03 <br />71% <br />49% <br />27% <br />Aquifer Recharge <br />In a normal year, the Central Valley aquifers are <br />recharged with excess from surface irrigation deliver- <br />ies and rainwater percolation. For the Central Valley <br />as a whole, this aquifer recharge generally exceeds <br />ground -water withdrawals, although withdrawals <br />exceed recharge in local areas of persistent ground- <br />water overdraft (CDWR, 2003). In the base period, <br />for example, the Central Valley ground -water <br />recharge is 0.21 m/year (0.63 ft/year) (Table 7) com- <br />pared to ground -water pumping of 0.16 m/year <br />(0.50 ft/year) (Table 6). Excess ground -water storage <br />derived from recharge in normal years helps to main- <br />tain ground -water storage levels during short -dura- <br />tion droughts when there is a dramatic decline in <br />recharge. Average recharge across the Central Valley <br />drops 14 %, during the slight drought scenario, to as <br />much as 42 %, during the severe drought scenario <br />(Table 7). <br />Annual rainfall rates are highest in the northern <br />Sacramento Basin and lowest in the southern Tulare <br />Basin. Under the simulated drought scenarios, <br />recharge varies across regions in proportion to changes <br />in both surface water deliveries and rainfall. In the <br />severe drought scenario for example, the Sacramento, <br />San Joaquin, and Tulare Basins experience large <br />declines in both precipitation and surface water deliv- <br />eries and register large declines in aquifer recharge. <br />The regional variation in rainfall helps to explain the <br />regional variation in recharge not explained by regio- <br />nal differences in surface water deliveries. <br />Stream - Aquifer Flows <br />In normal years, the rivers in the Sacramento and <br />San Joaquin Basins are net "gaining rivers," meaning <br />that their flow is increased by a net movement of <br />water from aquifers that are adjacent to rivers <br />(Table 8). Alternatively, in normal years, the rivers <br />in the Eastside Drainage and Tulare Basin are "los- <br />ing rivers," with a net movement of water out of riv- <br />ers and into adjacent aquifers. Stream - aquifer flows <br />in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Basins are larger <br />than those in the Eastside Drainage and Tulare <br />Basin, and tend to dominate the average stream - <br />aquifer flow in the Central Valley, which experiences <br />a net flow of water from aquifers to rivers in normal <br />years. The net flow of water from ground water to <br />rivers decreases during droughts as regional ground- <br />water levels decline in response to reduced recharge <br />and increased withdrawals. In addition, flows from <br />rivers to aquifers decrease because there is less water <br />available in the rivers. Net ground -water discharges <br />TABLE 7. Impact of Drought on Aquifer Recharge. <br />TABLE 8. Impact of Drought on Stream - Aquifer Flows <br />Hydrologic <br />Region <br />Base <br />Period <br />(- /year) <br />Change From Base Period <br />Moderate <br />Drought <br />(m/year) <br />Base <br />Severe <br />Moderate <br />Slight <br />Hydrologic <br />Period <br />Drought <br />Drought <br />Drought <br />Region <br />(m /year) <br />( m/year) <br />(m/year) <br />(m/year) <br />Sacramento <br />0.21 <br />-0.13 <br />-0.08 <br />-0.05 <br />Eastside <br />0.05 <br />-0.03 <br />-0.03 <br />-0.01 <br />San Joaquin <br />0.24 <br />-0.11 <br />-0.06 <br />-0.03 <br />Tulare <br />0.21 <br />-0.07 <br />-0.06 <br />-0.02 <br />Central Valley <br />0.21 <br />-0.09 <br />-0.06 <br />-0.03 <br />Change( %) <br />-42% <br />-28% <br />-4% <br />TABLE 8. Impact of Drought on Stream - Aquifer Flows <br />Hydrologic <br />Region <br />Base <br />Period <br />(- /year) <br />Severe <br />Drought <br />(m/year) <br />Moderate <br />Drought <br />(m/year) <br />Slight <br />Drought <br />( m/year) <br />Sacramento <br />-0.131 <br />-0.036 <br />-0.084 <br />-0.104 <br />Eastside <br />0.037 <br />0.018 <br />0.018 <br />0.023 <br />San Joaquin <br />-0.076 <br />0.006 <br />-0.036 <br />-0.040 <br />Tulare <br />0.015 <br />0.011 <br />0.013 <br />0.016 <br />Central Valley <br />-0.078 <br />-0.036 <br />-0.058 <br />-0.064 <br />Change (%) <br />-68% <br />-32% <br />-23% <br />Note: Positive values are from the stream to the aquifer, and <br />negative values are from the aquifer to the stream. <br />JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION 863 JAWRA <br />