My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150299 Fesability Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
C150299 Fesability Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2011 3:14:22 PM
Creation date
10/14/2009 1:17:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150299
Contractor Name
Lake Canal Reservoir Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Larimer
Weld
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Based on the total project cost from Table 2, the loan amounts, the payments to the CWCB for a 30 <br />year loan at 2.75% interest, and the cost per share of stock are shown in Table 3. The yearly cost <br />per share of stock as shown in Table 3 is the loan payment divided by 160 shares. The yearly cost <br />per acre-foot of water as shown in Table 3 is the loan payment divided by the 165 acre-feet of water <br />which will potentially be saved by repairing South Gray. <br />TABLE 3 <br />LOAN PAYMENTS <br />AL~RNATIVE LOAN YEARi.Y YEARL~ YEA~ti~~ C~~S~ <br /> ~ <br />' <br /> <br />~ ~ ~NIDi~NT ' ~~fl.~T <br />~ ~O~'T~~~R <br />x <br />- PEit <br />A ~~ <br />' <br />~ <br />' <br />' <br />' <br />" <br />' <br />~ <br />' <br />~~ AY <br />' ~ , # ~r'~ 13a.K kf <br />~ ~A' <br />~~'~' ,+ <br />+v,lk ~, - <br />~~ OF ~ t ~ '4t <br />~ <br />{ <br />~ <br />+~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />3`i <br />EC} <br />~~FUI(~~~~~'+~u ~~ ~ <br />,~ <br />, ~ ~ <br />, <br />> <br /> <br />' , <br />~ ~ ~ ~~~~=~~~z ~~ <br />~~~CI~ S ~ ~~ ~~~~~~ <br />~~5~ <br />° <br />, <br />< , <br />~ ~.~ ~ ~ <br />; ~~ ; ~ , <br />, ~~ ,, ~ ~ ~ ~z <br />~ <br />~ ~ ~ <br />~ ~ <br />~ ~:~~~~~~ z. <br />; ~~OR~iG~ <br />~ , <br />, « f f ~ 1r. . , a. <br />,. ....1 . .,.v ,.. ... ...- ~ <br />.-. .. „ .i, ..~.:~. ~. J'~ ...:. :... . .. .~:.-~ ~ R ~~ .~1. ~:Y.« ~ <br />i.~... <br />-4 ._,~...,..'~f.Yh ~ .... <~ ~ <br />. 6 : <br />Alternative 1 $ 389,700 $ 19,245 $ 120 $ 117 <br />Alternative 2 $ 380,250 $ 18,778 $ 117 $ 114 <br />Alternative 3 $ 613,000 $ 30,273 $ 189 $ 184 <br />THE SELECTED PROJECT <br />The Lake Canal Reservoir Company has chosen Alternative 1 as the best alternative to meet their <br />goals. Alternative 2 is similar to Alternative 1 and has a slightly lower estimated cost. However, the <br />Company chose Alternative 1 based on the road access being off the dam crest and the smaller <br />breach excavation. Based on this, the following financial plan will be developed for Alternative 1. <br />FINANCIAL PLAN <br />The required capital for the project for Alternative 1, during 2009 and 2010 that would be required <br />for design and construction, is shown in Table 4. The required funds for 2010 include the LCRC <br />10% share of the proj ect and the 1% loan origination fee to be paid to the CWCB. For 2011 through <br />2020 the funds required include the yearly loan payment and the payment to the Project Reserve <br />Fund. For 2021 through 2039, the funds shown are the yearly payment to service the loan. <br />Gray Reservoirs-Feasibility Study Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.