Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132:1251-1256, 2003
<br />© Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 2003
<br />Decline of the Razorback Sucker in Lake Mohave, Colorado
<br />River, Arizona and Nevada
<br />PAUL C. MARSH,* CAROL A. PACEY, AND BRIAN R. KESNER
<br />Arizona State University, School of Life Sciences,
<br />Tempe, Arizona 85287-4501, USA
<br />Abstract.-The razorback sucker Xyrauchen texanus is
<br />an endangered fish endemic to the Colorado River basin
<br />in the western United States. Once widely distributed
<br />and common throughout the basin, the species has been
<br />eliminated from most of its former range by establish-
<br />ment of nonnative fishes and water development, and
<br />remaining numbers have dwindled precipitously from
<br />historical levels. Although Lake Mohave, Arizona and
<br />Nevada, supports the largest and genetically most di-
<br />verse remaining population, razorback sucker abundance
<br />in the lake plummeted from historical numbers in the
<br />hundreds of thousands to only 44,000 in 1991 and fewer
<br />than 3,000 in 2001. This population is limited primarily
<br />to large, old adults because predation on their larvae by
<br />nonnative fishes has precluded measurable recruitment
<br />for nearly half a century. At the current rate of decline,
<br />extirpation is anticipated within this decade because, at
<br />this time, there is no practicable method to remove the
<br />continuing threat of nonnative predators to razorback
<br />sucker larvae. As such, the persistence of razorback
<br />suckers in Lake Mohave depends on a repatriation pro-
<br />gram begun in 1991, which uses wild-produced larvae
<br />that are reared in captivity and returned to the lake at a
<br />size that is less susceptible to predation.
<br />The razorback sucker Xyrauchen texanus is
<br />among a suite of now-endangered, endemic "big-
<br />river" fishes of the Colorado River basin of the
<br />western United States. Historically, it was widely
<br />distributed and abundant to common in the main-
<br />stream and major tributaries from Wyoming south
<br />through Colorado, Utah, and Nevada, into Arizona
<br />and California, and to the Gulf of California in
<br />Sonora and Baja, Mexico (Minckley 1973). Fed-
<br />eral listing in 1991 was a result of population de-
<br />clines and range contractions due largely to im-
<br />pacts of nonnative (introduced) fishes and habitat
<br />alterations associated with regional water devel-
<br />opment (USFWS 1998). Riverine populations per-
<br />sist only in the upper Colorado River basin up-
<br />stream from Glen Canyon Dam, but these are small
<br />and isolated (McAda and Wydoski 1980; Modde
<br />et al. 1996). Populations in all but one lower-basin
<br />reservoir also are small, while a few individuals
<br />are occasionally encountered in other highly mod-
<br />* Corresponding author: fish.drCCasu.edu
<br />Received August 16, 2002; accepted April 29, 2003
<br />ified lower Colorado River reaches (Marsh and
<br />Minckley 1989; Minckley et al. 1991; Holden et
<br />al. 2001). The largest remaining razorback sucker
<br />population occurs in Lake Mohave, a mainstream
<br />impoundment in Arizona and Nevada.
<br />The long-term effective female population of
<br />razorback suckers in Lake Mohave was estimated
<br />via molecular techniques to be in the hundreds of
<br />thousands (Garrigan et al. 2002; Minckley et al.
<br />2003), and these fish likely were derived from a
<br />historical population that numbered in the millions
<br />of individuals basinwide. The Lake Mohave pop-
<br />ulation today consists of fish that were produced
<br />in the riverine environment during the early 1950s,
<br />when young were abundant (Winn and Miller
<br />1954). In the present impoundment, most remain-
<br />ing adults are estimated to exceed 50 years old
<br />(McCarthy and Minckley 1987). Natural recruit-
<br />ment into the population is precluded by predation
<br />on early life stages by nonnative fishes (Marsh and
<br />Langhorst 1988): juveniles are absent from col-
<br />lections, and there is only one record of natural
<br />recruitment since the early 1950s (Marsh and
<br />Minckley 1989). Abundance estimates for the
<br />Lake Mohave razorback sucker population de-
<br />clined dramatically from 60,000-75,000 in the
<br />1980s to fewer than 25,000 in the mid-1990s
<br />(Marsh, unpublished data), and extirpation was an-
<br />ticipated by the early 2000s (Minckley 1983;
<br />Minckley et al. 1991; Pacey and Marsh, in press).
<br />We present the most recent population abun-
<br />dance estimate and trend data, plus a population
<br />viability analysis (PVA) for razorback suckers in
<br />Lake Mohave, based on mark-recapture records
<br />for the 12-year period, 1991-2002.
<br />Methods
<br />Razorback sucker population abundance moni-
<br />toring was conducted in Lake Mohave, a105-km-
<br />long, 11,400-ha, run-of-the-river reservoir im-
<br />pounded on the mainstream Colorado River be-
<br />tween Hoover Dam to the north and Davis Dam
<br />to the south. Recent work was part of a regional
<br />management and recovery effort by an ad-hoc Na-
<br />tive Fish Work Group (NFWG; Mueller 1995) and
<br />1251
|