Laserfiche WebLink
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132:1251-1256, 2003 <br />© Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 2003 <br />Decline of the Razorback Sucker in Lake Mohave, Colorado <br />River, Arizona and Nevada <br />PAUL C. MARSH,* CAROL A. PACEY, AND BRIAN R. KESNER <br />Arizona State University, School of Life Sciences, <br />Tempe, Arizona 85287-4501, USA <br />Abstract.-The razorback sucker Xyrauchen texanus is <br />an endangered fish endemic to the Colorado River basin <br />in the western United States. Once widely distributed <br />and common throughout the basin, the species has been <br />eliminated from most of its former range by establish- <br />ment of nonnative fishes and water development, and <br />remaining numbers have dwindled precipitously from <br />historical levels. Although Lake Mohave, Arizona and <br />Nevada, supports the largest and genetically most di- <br />verse remaining population, razorback sucker abundance <br />in the lake plummeted from historical numbers in the <br />hundreds of thousands to only 44,000 in 1991 and fewer <br />than 3,000 in 2001. This population is limited primarily <br />to large, old adults because predation on their larvae by <br />nonnative fishes has precluded measurable recruitment <br />for nearly half a century. At the current rate of decline, <br />extirpation is anticipated within this decade because, at <br />this time, there is no practicable method to remove the <br />continuing threat of nonnative predators to razorback <br />sucker larvae. As such, the persistence of razorback <br />suckers in Lake Mohave depends on a repatriation pro- <br />gram begun in 1991, which uses wild-produced larvae <br />that are reared in captivity and returned to the lake at a <br />size that is less susceptible to predation. <br />The razorback sucker Xyrauchen texanus is <br />among a suite of now-endangered, endemic "big- <br />river" fishes of the Colorado River basin of the <br />western United States. Historically, it was widely <br />distributed and abundant to common in the main- <br />stream and major tributaries from Wyoming south <br />through Colorado, Utah, and Nevada, into Arizona <br />and California, and to the Gulf of California in <br />Sonora and Baja, Mexico (Minckley 1973). Fed- <br />eral listing in 1991 was a result of population de- <br />clines and range contractions due largely to im- <br />pacts of nonnative (introduced) fishes and habitat <br />alterations associated with regional water devel- <br />opment (USFWS 1998). Riverine populations per- <br />sist only in the upper Colorado River basin up- <br />stream from Glen Canyon Dam, but these are small <br />and isolated (McAda and Wydoski 1980; Modde <br />et al. 1996). Populations in all but one lower-basin <br />reservoir also are small, while a few individuals <br />are occasionally encountered in other highly mod- <br />* Corresponding author: fish.drCCasu.edu <br />Received August 16, 2002; accepted April 29, 2003 <br />ified lower Colorado River reaches (Marsh and <br />Minckley 1989; Minckley et al. 1991; Holden et <br />al. 2001). The largest remaining razorback sucker <br />population occurs in Lake Mohave, a mainstream <br />impoundment in Arizona and Nevada. <br />The long-term effective female population of <br />razorback suckers in Lake Mohave was estimated <br />via molecular techniques to be in the hundreds of <br />thousands (Garrigan et al. 2002; Minckley et al. <br />2003), and these fish likely were derived from a <br />historical population that numbered in the millions <br />of individuals basinwide. The Lake Mohave pop- <br />ulation today consists of fish that were produced <br />in the riverine environment during the early 1950s, <br />when young were abundant (Winn and Miller <br />1954). In the present impoundment, most remain- <br />ing adults are estimated to exceed 50 years old <br />(McCarthy and Minckley 1987). Natural recruit- <br />ment into the population is precluded by predation <br />on early life stages by nonnative fishes (Marsh and <br />Langhorst 1988): juveniles are absent from col- <br />lections, and there is only one record of natural <br />recruitment since the early 1950s (Marsh and <br />Minckley 1989). Abundance estimates for the <br />Lake Mohave razorback sucker population de- <br />clined dramatically from 60,000-75,000 in the <br />1980s to fewer than 25,000 in the mid-1990s <br />(Marsh, unpublished data), and extirpation was an- <br />ticipated by the early 2000s (Minckley 1983; <br />Minckley et al. 1991; Pacey and Marsh, in press). <br />We present the most recent population abun- <br />dance estimate and trend data, plus a population <br />viability analysis (PVA) for razorback suckers in <br />Lake Mohave, based on mark-recapture records <br />for the 12-year period, 1991-2002. <br />Methods <br />Razorback sucker population abundance moni- <br />toring was conducted in Lake Mohave, a105-km- <br />long, 11,400-ha, run-of-the-river reservoir im- <br />pounded on the mainstream Colorado River be- <br />tween Hoover Dam to the north and Davis Dam <br />to the south. Recent work was part of a regional <br />management and recovery effort by an ad-hoc Na- <br />tive Fish Work Group (NFWG; Mueller 1995) and <br />1251