Laserfiche WebLink
<br />[Note] <br /> <br />Isitive spe- <br />, and New <br />I for listing <br />I species. <br />III this spe- <br />abundance <br />lolden and <br />:stgen and <br />Stalnaker <br />ld Douglas <br />t (Brouder <br />'asites and <br />I; Brouder <br />anicek and <br />1981; Be- <br />Karp and <br />, However, <br />)n the age <br />Llly in the <br />ary objec- <br />:e, growth, <br />population <br />te annulus <br />lub. <br /> <br />: structure <br />: collected <br />December <br />per 72 km <br />y using a <br />)ther tech- <br />nmel nets, <br />'tal length <br />recorded, <br />of otoliths <br />'esence of <br /> <br />of round- <br />mounting <br />es using <br />I grinding <br />mbination <br />Sectioned <br />e analysis <br /> <br /> <br />system (EPIX, Inc.; PIXCI software) consisting of <br />a personal computer, video monitor, and camera <br />equipment connected to a compound microscope. <br />Otoliths were viewed under oil immersion at 40X <br />magnification using transmitted light. Measure- <br />ments were taken from the nucleus to the outer <br />edge of each opaque band and from the nucleus <br />to the margin or otolith radius. <br />Age and growth.~ Three independent readers <br />counted the number of annuli on each cross section <br />and assigned ages accordingly. When discrepan- <br />cies occurred, all readers reread the otolith and if <br />the readings still disagreed, the otolith was dis- <br />carded. Precision in age estimates among readers <br />was determined by calculating a coefficient of var- <br />iation (CV == 100 X SD/mean; Chang 1982). <br />Length of roundtail chub at previous age was <br />back-calculated from otolith measurements using <br />the modified Fraser-Lee method and a biologically <br />relevant intercept (Campana 1990) because the <br />size of fish and otolith at swim-up were available <br />from hatchery-reared fish used in the validation <br />component of this study. The biological intercept <br />method is based on the assumption of a constant <br />linear relationship between fish and otolith length <br />within an individual. Deviations from this as- <br />sumption using the biological intercept, which <br />uses a biologically determined intercept value, are <br />less problematic in the calculation of annual <br />growth than the traditional Fraser-Lee method, <br />which uses a statistically estimated intercept value <br />(Campana and Jones 1992). Back-calculated <br />length at age was determined using the following <br />equation: <br /> <br />La == Lc + (00 - Oc)(Lc - Lo)/(Oc - 00), <br /> <br />where La is the back-calculated length to annulus <br />a, Lc is the length of fish at capture, Lo is the length <br />of fish at swimcup (8.5 mm), 00 is the otolith radius <br />at annulus a, Oc is the otolith radius at capture, <br />and 00 is the otolith radius at swim-up (0.1243 <br />mm). Because t-tests did not indicate significant <br />differences between male and female lengths at <br />age, data for both sexes were combined to back- <br />calculate growth. <br />Growth rate of roundtail chub was determined by <br />fitting the von Bertalanffy growth model to back- <br />calculated length-at-age data. The model is <br /> <br />L, == L~[1 - e-K(Ho)j, <br /> <br />where L, is the total length at time t (years), L~ is <br />the maximum theoretical attainable total length <br />(mm), K is the growth coefficient, and to is the <br /> <br />NOTE <br /> <br />867 <br /> <br />time (years) when length theoretically would be <br />zero (von Bertalanffy 1957). Model parameters <br />were estimated using the computer program FISH- <br />PARM (Prager et aL 1989). <br />Otolith validation.- To validate opaque bands as <br />annuli and to determine time of annulus formation, <br />otoliths from roundtail chub collected monthly <br />from January through December 1997 were ex- <br />amined, and mean marginal increment data (dis- <br />tance from the last annulus to the edge of the oto- <br />lith) were plotted against month of capture. To <br />further validate the use of otoliths to age roundtail <br />chub, adult fish were collected from the upper <br />Verde River in March 1997 and transported to Ar- <br />izona Game and Fish Department's Bubbling <br />Ponds Fish Hatchery in Cornville, Arizona. Brood- <br />fish were artificially spawned, progeny were raised <br />in the laboratory. and fry were reared outdoors in <br />an earthen pond. Approximately 50 roundtail chub <br />were collected annually in late June to early July <br />for 3 years using a fyke net, measured for TL (mil- <br />limeters), and sacrificed. Otoliths from known- <br />aged fish were removed and aged using the same <br />procedures as wild-caught fish. In addition to val- <br />idating annul marks on sagittal otoliths of known- <br />age roundtail chub, daily increments on otoliths of <br />age-O roundtail chub were validated by comparing <br />the age (in days) with the number of rings on their <br />otoliths. <br /> <br />Results <br /> <br />Age and Growth <br /> <br />A total of 312 roundtail chub, ranging in length <br />from 50 to 415 mm TL, were collected from the <br />upper Verde River (of which 280 had otoliths that <br />were legible), aged with a 96% first-time reader <br />agreement, and measured. Among-reader preci- <br />sion (CV) for wild-caught roundtail chub otoliths <br />was 8.2. Ages of roundtail chub ranged from 1 to <br />7 years, the oldest fish from the upper Verde River <br />population having completed seven growing sea- <br />sons. Two distinct cohorts of roundtail chub were <br />sampled in both 1998 and 1999. The majority <br />(44%) of fish collected in 1998 were age 5 (1993 <br />year-class) followed by age-3 fish (36%; 1995 <br />year-class). Similarly, roundtail chub from the <br />1993 and 1995 year-classes (age 6 and age 4, re- <br />spectively) comprised the two highest percentages <br />of fish collected in 1999 at 42% and 28%, re- <br />spectively. The longest and heaviest fish collected <br />was a 427 -nun TL, 836-g, age-7 female; the largest <br />male (age 6) was 413 mm TL and 629 g. <br />Mean length at age did not significantly differ <br /> <br />". <br /> <br />