My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9720
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9720
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:58 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:17:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9720
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) genetics management and captive propagation plan, Dexter National Fish Hatchery and Technology Center.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
Dexter National Fish Hatchery and Technology Center
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
and Westerberg 2002; Allendorf and Leary 1988). This theory has caused concern in the fisheries <br />community because of the apparent loss of genetic variation in some hatchery stocks and the <br />implications of this loss to the augmented population (Waples 1991b). Allendorf and Phelps <br />(1980) suggest this loss may result in a decrease in fitness, such as a loss of alleles that are <br />important in disease resistance. Genetically, the effects of population supplementation with <br />hatchery stocks range from no effect (no survival of stocked fish) to a swamping of the wild <br />genome with hatchery stocks as indicated by marker data (Skaala et al. 1990; Hindar et al.1991). <br />Many authors have modeled potential losses of genetic diversity associated with wild stock <br />augmentation (Laikre and Ryman 1990; Waples 1991 a; Ryman and Laikre 1996); however, the <br />direct relationship between genetic marker diversity and fitness components are rarely addressed <br />and still controversial (Milligan et al. 1994; Waples 1991). Seldom have hatchery stocks been <br />subjected to extensive genetic monitoring as a management, rather than a research tool. We <br />propose to genetically characterize and monitor broodstocks and production fish to prevent the <br />loss of or a change in genetic diversity. <br />Genetic Risks for Broodstock Management and Captive Propagation <br />Founder effects <br />"The fundamental genetic hazard associated with broodstock management within a gene <br />pool maintenance program is loss or undesired changes in the genetic variation or identity of the <br />hatchery population with respect to its donor source" (Williamson 2001). One of the earliest <br />recognized genetic risks of captive rearing on native fish was the potential of a founder effect in <br />the hatchery population. This effect occurs when an inadequate sample of the wild genome is <br />used to develop the captive stock. Typically, this is the result of using too few individuals. Thus, <br />the genetics of future generations do not adequately reflect the donor population. This risk can be <br />minimized by genetic analysis of wild and hatchery stocks to ensure that hatchery stocks contain a <br />24
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.