My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9717
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9717
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:58 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:16:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9717
Author
Native Aquatic Species Program.
Title
Conservation and management plan for three fish species in Utah
USFW Year
2006.
USFW - Doc Type
addressing needs for roundtail chub (Gila robusta), bluehead sucker (Catostomus discobolus), and flannelmouth sucker (Catostomus latipinnis).
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 51 <br /> <br />any event, hatchery fish will also be adequate to restore a population as long as appropriate hatchery <br />management plans have been developed. We will consider our efforts successful if the designated <br />number of populations are reached and persist through the life of the Agreement. <br /> <br />In addition to the number of populations in a management unit we must also identify the adequate <br />population size within each unit to help determine if we are successful. For each species, the Team <br />will attempt to determine the number of individuals required per population to maintain the <br />population in perpetuity. Because we have limited life history and historical information on these <br />species, we must leave this criterion for later refinement. We will use historical and newly collected <br />data to further refine population criteria. These values will be assigned by year five of the Agreement <br />(2009). <br /> <br />If we find that it is too difficult or expensive to effectively evaluate the number of individuals per <br />population statewide, we will instead use population trends or relative abundance over the course of <br />the Agreement to determine whether we are successful in meeting this criteria. Because it will likely <br />be difficult to maintain up-to-date information on all streams statewide, we will not require recent <br />information on all streams at the end of the Agreement. Instead. we will evaluate' the observed <br />situation from 2009 - 2014 (the last five years of the Agreement), compile that with the information <br />obtained through baseline surveys in 2003 through 2009, and use all of this information to make a <br />determination. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.