My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9717
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9717
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:58 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:16:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9717
Author
Native Aquatic Species Program.
Title
Conservation and management plan for three fish species in Utah
USFW Year
2006.
USFW - Doc Type
addressing needs for roundtail chub (Gila robusta), bluehead sucker (Catostomus discobolus), and flannelmouth sucker (Catostomus latipinnis).
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 36 <br /> <br />FLANNELMOUTH SUCKER <br /> <br />Flannelmouth sucker reside in mainstem and tributary streams. Elements of flannelmouth sucker <br />habitat include 0.9 to 6.1 m deep murky pools with little to no vegetation and deep runs and riffles <br />(Bezzerides and Bestgen 2002, McAda 1977, Sigler and Sigler 1996). Preferred substrates consist of <br />gravel, rock, sand, or mud (McAda 1977, Sigler and Sigler 1996). Flannelmouth sucker partition <br />habitat use by life stage, with young fish occupying quiet, shallow riffles and near-shore eddies, and <br />adults occupying deep riffles and runs. Flannelmouth sucker do not prosper in impoundments <br />(Bezzerides and Bestgen 2002, McAda 1977, Sigler and Sigler 1996), though one introduction during <br />the 1970's in Lake Havasu in the lower Colorado River Basin continues to persist (Mueller and <br />Wydoski 2003). Flannelmouth sucker are opportunistic, benthic omnivores consuming algae, <br />detritus, plant debris, and aquatic invertebrates (Bezzerides and Bestgen 2002, McAda 1977, <br />Osmundson 1999, Sigler and Sigler 1996). Food consumed depends on availability, age class, and <br />time of season (McAda 1977, Sigler and Sigler 1996). <br /> <br />Flannelmouth sucker mature at four or five years of age; males mature earliest (McAda 1977, Sigler <br />and Sigler 1996). Females ripen at water temperatures of lOoC, whereas males ripen earlier in the <br />spring (6.1 to 6.70C) and remain fertile for a longer period of time (McAda 1977, Sigler and Sigler <br />1996). Seasonal migrations are made in the spring to suitable spawning habitat (Sigler and Sigler <br />1996, Suttkus and Clemmer 1979). McKinney et al. (1999; see also Bergersen 1992, Chart 1987, <br />Chart and Bergersen 1987) documented long-range movements (ca. 98-231 kIn) among adult and <br />sub-adult fish, although the roles these movements (and obstructions to such, i.e., dams) play in the <br />life history of the fish are unclear. Many researchers suspect that flannelmouth sucker return to natal <br />tributaries for the purpose of spawning (Snyder and Muth 1990; Weiss et al. 1998). Populations <br />spawn for two to five weeks over gravel substrates. A female will produce 9,000 to 23,000 adhesive, <br />demersal eggs. After fertilization, the eggs sink to the bottom of the stream and attach to substrate or <br />drift between crevices (Sigler and Sigler 1996). <br /> <br />FLANNELMOUTH SUCKER STATUS REVIEW <br /> <br />General <br /> <br />Historical literature suggests that flannelmouth sucker were common to all parts of the Colorado <br />River Basin up to the 1960's (Jordan and Evermann 1902, Minckley 1973, Sigler and Miller 1963). <br />They have been greatly reduced in the lower Colorado River Basin, but are still widespread in the <br />upper basin (Bezzerides and Bestgen 2002). They are thought to remain in at least 50% of their <br />historical range above Glen Canyon Dam (Bezzerides and Bestgen 2002). There are extant <br />populations in the mainstem Colorado and in tributaries in the Grand Canyon reach and in the Virgin <br />River in Utah, Arizona, and Nevada (see Figure 2-8). Of the historical flannelmouth sucker sites in <br />Utah, the species has only been extirpated from sites near Flaming Gorge Dam (Vanicek et al. 1970). <br />Flannelmouth sucker continue to be documented at all other sites. Hybridization with nonnative <br />white sucker is thought to be an increasing threat. White sucker are commonly seen in the Green <br />River and have been seen occasionally in smaller tributaries of the Green and Colorado rivers. As the <br />range of the white sucker increases, it is thought that the range of the flannelmouth sucker will <br />decrease, as hybridization between the two species is prevalent (Anderson and Stewart 2000, Bestgen <br />and Crist 2000, Holden and Crist 1981, Holden and Stalnaker 1975). <br /> <br />Northeastern Region <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.