Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 22 <br /> <br />and Arizona was recently divided into three species, G. robusta, G. intermedia, and G. nigra through <br />genetic analysis (Minckley and DeMarais 1990). Additional investigation of these relationships and <br />resulting offspring is needed and may affect future conservation and management actions for <br />roundtail chub and other Gila species. <br /> <br />The Virgin chub (G. seminuda) found in the Virgin River has been historically treated as a <br />subspecies of roundtail chub (Maddux et al. 1995) and is thought to have originated through <br />hybridization between the bonytail and the Colorado roundtail chub (Maddux et al. 1995, Sigler and <br />Sigler 1996 and references therein). In 1993, taxonomic revisions were accepted, and the Virgin chub <br />was asserted species status as G, seminuda (Maddux et al. 1995). It is currently listed as endangered <br />under the federal Endangered Species Act. <br /> <br />Roundtail chub presently exist in the United States only in the Gila River Basin, the Little Colorado <br />. River Basin, the Bill Williams River Basin, and the Upper Colorado River Basin, including the <br />Green River Basin. Lee et al. (1980) also recorded occurrences in northern Mexico, which was <br />anecdotally confirmed by personal communications in 2001 with S. Contreras-Balderas <br />(Bioconservacion A.C., Monterrey, Nuevo Leon) and A. Varela-Romero (Universidad de Sonora, <br />Hermasillo). In Utah, roundtail chub occur in the Green and Colorado rivers and major tributaries of <br />the two. Historically, roundtail chub were found in all of the state's major drainages, though <br />abundance information was not recorded (see Figure 2-6) (Utah Division of Wildlife Resources <br />2001). <br /> <br />ROUNDTAIL CHUB STATUS REVIEW <br /> <br />General <br /> <br />Historical literature suggests that roundtail chub were common to all parts of the Colorado River <br />Basin up to the 1960's (Jordan and Evermann 1902, Minckley 1973, Sigler and Miller 1963). They <br />are believed to have occurred in most faster flowing rivers and streams below 2,300 meters elevation <br />(Bezzerides and Bestgen 2002). While they continue to occupy a number of rivers and streams in the <br />upper basin, declines in numbers and relative abundance have been observed in many of these <br />locations (Bezzerides and Bestgen 2002, Brunson and Christopherson 2003, Platania 1990). <br /> <br />Northeastern Region <br /> <br />Roundtail chub abundance in the mainstem Green River and associated tributaries has declined since <br />the installation of multiple water development projects beginning in 1902 (Bezzerides and Bestgen <br />2002). In addition to water development, the introduction of nonnative predators and competitors <br />over the same time period has proven to be detrimental to the roundtail chub (Bezzerides and <br />Bestgen 2002) as have the presence of oil exploration projects within the drainage. Roundtail chub <br />were described as abundant in the Duchesne River as late as 1975 (Holden and Stalnaker 1975) and <br />common in 1982 (Tyus et al. 1982), but have since declined in numbers (Brunson and <br />Christopherson 2003). In the White River, oil exploration projects and the presence of non-natives <br />are the largest problems. Roundtail chub were considered abundant in the White River in 1975 <br />(Holden and Stalnaker 1975), but only relatively common in 1981 (11 % of catch; Lanigan and Berry <br />1981) and 1982 (8-10% of catch; Miller et al. 1982). Flaming Gorge Dam is thought to have <br />impacted roundtail chub at three sites: Willow Creek, Little Hole, and Brown's Park. Roundtail chub <br />were found at these locations in 1962, but not in 1964, 1965, 19661 or 2004 (UDWR unpublished). <br />