Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 20 <br /> <br />Species Overview <br /> <br /> <br />The three fish species are all in the order Cypriniformes. Roundtail chub (Figure 2-3) are in the <br />family Cyprinidae, the minnows. Flannelmouth sucker <br />(Figure 2-4) and bluehead sucker (Figure 2-5) are in <br />the family Catostomidae, the suckers. Common <br />characteristics of endemic, large-river fish including <br />the three fish species, are: 1) fusiform bodies, 2) <br />humped or keeled dorsal surfaces (only present in the <br />endangered Colorado River species, not the three <br />species), 3) leathery skins with embedded scales, and <br />4) large, often falcate, fins. Such morphological Fi2:ure 2-3 Adult roundtail chub (Gila robusta) <br />features, combined with relatively long life spans, are <br />thought to be adaptations to the harsh, unpredictable physical environment of the Colorado River <br />Basin (Bezzerides and Bestgen 2002, <br />Minckley 1991, Scoppettone 1988, Steams <br />1993). All three species reach relatively large <br />sizes (ca. 300 - 500 mm), are relatively long- <br />lived, and are thought to require only sporadic <br />recruitment to maintain population stability. <br />Of the three fish species, tlannelmouth sucker <br />can demonstrate long-range movement (ca. <br />hundreds of stream miles) ili!oughout the <br />course of their lives, which is not generally <br />observed for the other two species (Bezzerides <br />and Bestgen 2002). The two catostomids are primarily benthic feeders (Banks 1964; Childs et al. <br />1998; Grabowski and Hiebert 1989; Greger and Deacon 1988; Minckley 1973; Muth and Snyder <br />1995), whereas adult roundtail chub are frequently omnivorous and can be piscivorous and <br />insectivorous as large juveniles and adults (Bestgen 1985; Karp and Tyus 1990; Koster 1957; <br />McDonald and Dotson 1960; Neve 1976; Schreiber Figure 2-5 Adult bluehead sucker <br />and Minckley 1981; Rinne 1992; Tyus and Minckley (Catostomus discobolus) <br />1988; Vanicek and Kramer 1969). Additional life <br />history characteristics, distribution and abundance <br />have been described in numerous texts and <br />publications for roundtail chub (Bestgen and Propst <br />1989, Brouder et al. 2000, Voeltz 2002), tlannelmouth <br />sucker (Chart 1987, Douglas and Marsh 1998, <br />McKinney et al. 1999), and bluehead sucker (e.g., <br />Bestgen 2000, Cavalli 1999, Holden and Minckley <br />1980, McAda 1977, McAda and Wydoski 1983). <br />Bluehead sucker are also discussed in Brunson and <br />Christopherson (2001), Jackson (2001), Mueller et al. (1998), and Valdez (1990). <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 2-4 Adult flannelmouth sucker (Catostomus <br />latipinnis) <br /> <br /> <br />Flannelmouth and bluehead sucker have most often been recorded in large rivers, though tributary <br />occurrences are often observed for both species (McAda et al. 1977; Fridell et al. 2004; Morvilius <br />and Fridell 2005; Walker and Hudson 2004; Walker and Birdsey 2005). It is currently thought that <br />they also use tributary streams for one or more life history stages (Maddux and Kepner 1988, Weiss <br />et al. 1998). In the past, roundtail chub were observed inmainstem habitats. Today; they are much <br />