Laserfiche WebLink
<br />LIST OF FIGURES <br /> <br />Figure 1. Map of the study site, showing Salt, Coyote and Boulders reaches <br />in Little Colorado River. .................................................................51 <br /> <br />Figure 2. Provisional mean daily discharge (cubic feet/second) data from <br />USGS gage station 0904200 located in Little Colorado River near <br /> <br />Cameron, Arizona.......................................................................... 52 <br /> <br />Figure 3. Turbidity readings taken in Little Colorado River during spring 2004. <br /> <br />......................................................................................................53 <br /> <br />Figure 4. Observed species compositions of all fish captured. Shaded <br />portions are native fish; Little Colorado River, spring 2004. ..........54 <br /> <br />Figure 5. Total length frequency distributions of all humpback chub captured; <br />Little Colorado River, spring 2004. ................................................55 <br /> <br />Figure 6. Cumulative length frequency charts of all HBC captured at three <br />different reaches (Salt, Coyote and Boulders); Little Colorado River, <br /> <br />spring 2004.................................................................................... 56 <br /> <br />Figure 7 . Length frequency distribution of all f1annelmouth sucker captured; <br />Little Colorado River, spring 2004. ................................................ 57 <br /> <br />Figure 8. Length frequency distributions of all bluehead sucker captured; <br />Little Colorado River, spring 2004. ................................................58 <br /> <br />j;igure 9. Length frequency distributions (shown as percentage of total) of all <br />humpback chub ~ 150 mm captured during the marking and <br />recapture events; Little Colorado River, spring 2004.....................59 <br /> <br />Figure 10. Cumulative length frequency distributions of humpback chub ~ 150 <br />mm captured; Little Colorado River, spring 2004. .........................60 <br /> <br />Figure 11. Spring abundance estimates of humpback chub ~ 150 mm. .........61 <br /> <br />Figure 12. Spring abundance estimates of humpback chub ~ 200 mm. .........62 <br /> <br />Figure 13. Provisional mean daily discharge (cubic feet/second; cfs) from <br />USGS gage station 0904200 located in Little Colorado River near <br /> <br />Cameron, Arizona.......................................................................... 63 <br /> <br />Figure 14. Turbidity readings taken during fall 2004; Little Colorado River........64 <br /> <br />Figure 15. Observed species comparisons of fish captured. Shaded portions <br />are native fish; Little Colorado River, fall 2004. .............................65 <br /> <br />7 <br />