My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9713
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9713
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:58 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:14:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9713
Author
VanHaverbeke, D.R.
Title
Stock assessment and fisheries monitoring activities in the Little Colorado River within Grand Canyon during 2004.
USFW Year
2005.
USFW - Doc Type
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Parasites <br /> <br />Percent occurrence of the external parasite (Lemaea cyprinacea) on HBC in <br />September was moderate, with 100 fish (22% of total HBC captures) observed <br />carrying the parasite, carrying 1-7 parasites per infected fish. Only one <br />f1annelmouth sucker was captured carrying one of the parasites. During October, <br />324 HBC were seen with Lemaea (14% oftotal HBC captures), each carrying 1-7 <br />parasites per fish. <br /> <br />Population Abundance Estimation <br /> <br />We used the following criteria to define our sampled population during the fall <br />mark-recapture effort. During September, 135 unique HBC ~ 150 mm were <br />marked [M]. During October, 416 unique HBC ~ 150 mm were captured [C], and <br />21 unique HBC ~ 150 mm were recaptured [R]. The smallest HBC recaptured <br />had a total length of 151 mm, and the largest HBC recaptured was 342 mm TL. <br /> <br />Figures 20 and 21, suggest some differences in the length frequencies of <br />marked, captured and recaptured fish. Using two-tailed Kolmogorov-Smirnov <br />tests, the length distribution of marked [M] HBC was significantly different from <br />captured [C] HBC (n1 = 135, n2 = 416, Z = 2.060, P < 0.001). However, the <br />length distribution of marked [M] HBC was not significantly different than <br />recaptured [R] HBC (n1 = 135, n2 = 21, Z = 0.636, P = 0.813; Figure 21). In <br />addition, there was no significant difference (X2 = 10.60, df = 5, P = 0.06) in the <br />mark rates of HBC within different length strata (Table 12). However, since the <br />population of marked fish was found to be significantly different from the <br />population of captured fish, it was necessary to stratify our abundance estimate <br />based on length (Seber 1982). <br /> <br />The optimal stratification is found by choosing length boundaries in a <br />contingency table setting of unmarked and marked fish that maximize the <br />homogeneity in mark rate among length groups (Seber 1982, Bernard and <br />Hansen 1992). This procedure was performed and it was found that the optimal <br />stratification occurred at 200 mm (l = 0.15). <br /> <br />In addition, there was no significant difference (l = 1.78, df = 2, P = 0.41) in the <br />mark rate among the three sampling reaches (Table 13). This test suggests that <br />the abundance estimate need not also be stratified by location (Le., Salt, Coyote <br />and Boulders reaches). <br /> <br />Based on the above tests, it was concluded that the abundance estimate <br />should be stratified by length (Le., those fish from 150 mm to < 201 mm and <br />those fish> 200 mm), but did not also need to be stratified by reach. The <br />resulting length stratified Chapman modified Petersen abundance estimate for <br />HBC ~ 150 in the lower 13.6 rkm of the LCR was 2,565 fish (SE = 519; Table 14). <br />Table 15 and Figure 22 show this estimate as compared against the historical <br />estimates obtained by Douglas and Marsh (1996) for HBC ~ 150 mm during <br />these months. <br /> <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.