My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9712
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9712
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:58 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:14:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9712
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Genetic characterization of Virgin River chub.
USFW Year
2008.
USFW - Doc Type
Dexter National Fish Hatchery and Technology Center
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
populations the chances of mating between relatives increase, and Fis may increase <br />accordingly (Frankham et al. 2002). The parameter FST is a measure of genetic distance <br />among populations. When populations are isolated (i.e. due to geographic barriers or <br />temporal differences), individuals within those populations mate with one another rather <br />than with individuals from other populations. The resulting population subdivision is a <br />form of non-random mating, and the FST value reflects how different the populations <br />have become as a result (Gillespie 1998). The parameter FIT can be thought of as the <br />overall measure of inbreeding. It is "the most inclusive measure of inbreeding in that it <br />takes into account both the effects of nonrandom mating within subpopulations (Fis) and <br />the effects of population subdivision (FST)" (Hartl and Clark 1997). <br />Table 2 shows the estimates of FIS over all loci for each sample. For purposes of <br />comparison, the values of Fis shown in parentheses for the upper Virgin River and Dexter <br />broodstock samples are the estimates calculated before the dataset was adjusted for null <br />allele frequencies. None of the samples had significant values of Fis (P > 0.05 after <br />correction for multiple tests) prior or subsequent to the adjustment for null allele <br />frequencies. These values indicate that within each population or sample, inbreeding is <br />minimal or nonexistent. <br />Genetic variation <br />Table 2 shows the results obtained using two measures of genetic variation: allelic <br />richness, and heterozygosity. The mean value of allelic richness (A) is an estimate of the <br />number of alleles per locus. Observed heterozygosity (Ho) is the frequency of observed <br />heterozygotes per sample; expected heterozygosity (HE) is the frequency of expected <br />11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.