Laserfiche WebLink
<br />on growth has been focused on these smaller individuals. The <br />analyses described in this report address the effect of tempera- <br />ture on growth rate ofHBC and attempt to estimate the length <br />at which fish transition from primarily LCR occupancy to <br />primarily mainstem occupancy. The general implication from <br />the tindings reported herein is that growth rate will increase <br />substantially with a tempemtureincrease from HfC to 20"C, as <br />is indicated by the values of Q< = 4.6 and Qm = 2.0. These coef- <br />ficients suggest that anabolic processes will more than double <br />relative to catabolic processes across this temperature range. <br />As an additional evaluation of the results of the analy- <br />sis. monthly growth rates from the TDGM were compared to <br />laboratory observations of juvenile HBC growth. Clarkson and <br />Childs (2000) conducted laboratory experiments to evaluate <br />the growth rate of larval HBC at WOC, 140C, and 200C. They <br />report monthly growth rates of I mm/month, 13 mm/month, <br />and 17 mm/month for these temperatures, respectively. Con- <br />sidering the estimated monthly growth rates from the TDGM <br />in tigure 24, the TDGM tends to overestimate the growth rates <br />reported by Clarkson and Childs (2000) at WOC and underes- <br />timate the growth rate at 20"C. However, the results reported <br />herein are in overall agreement with the laboratory study. <br />The TDGM and related age-length function should be of <br />considerable use to researchers studying HBC throughout the <br />Colorado River Basin. Additionally, this case history should <br />also be useful to anyone wishing to recover temperature- <br />dependent bioenergetic parameters for fish using capture- <br />recapture data, or to estimate the relationship and a<ssociated <br />uncertainty between fish age and length using non-lethal <br />techniques. This technique shows considerable promise in <br />extracting useful information on fish growth from field data, <br />rather than from laboratory studies, where such information is <br />typically obtained. <br /> <br />Incorporation of Ageing Error in ASMR <br />Assessments <br /> <br />A major criticism of the ASMR technique, as previously <br />applied. is that it does not explicitly account for uncertainty <br />in the assignment of age to individual tish (Kitchell and oth- <br />ers. 20(3). As a result, abundance, recruitment, and mortality <br />estimates may contain excessive bias. Additionally, estimates <br />of precision are likely overstated by not incorporating this <br />important source of uncertainty. The analyses presented in <br />this report attempt to address these concems by constructing a <br />more rigorous model to predict length as a function of age and <br />to incorporate uncertainty fi'om age assignments into estimates <br />of abundance and recruitment. Coggins and others (2006b) <br />conducted sensitivity analyses on the effect of random ageing <br />en-or and found little systematic bias in reconstructed recmit- <br />ment trends. However, the cUlTent analysis is a more rigorous <br />treatment of the problem and has two major implications. <br />First, model results of estimated adult abundance are still <br />very precise even when uncertainty in the assignment of age is <br />explicitly accounted for in the assessment. Following reviews <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />by Kitchell and others (2003) and Otis and Wickham (U.S. <br />Geological Survey, written commun., 2(06), this assessment <br />lends additional credibility to results frol1l ASMR, indicating <br />that it provides a rigorous measure of the state of the adult <br />portion of the LCR HBC population. It is recommended that <br />this assessment be considered "best available science" for use <br />in contemplating management decisions both within the Glen <br />Canyon Dam Adaptive M.magement Program and the U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service. <br />Second, this analysis points out the difficulty that open <br />population models generally have in the precise estimation <br />of recruitment (Williams and others, 200 I; Pine and others, <br />20(3). Because many of the most critical management ques- <br />tions for HBC center around how best to improve recruitment, <br />pal1icularly considering improved rearing conditions in the <br />mainstem Colorado River, it will be difficult for ASMR to <br />detect statistically significant changes in recruitment, unless <br />those changes are quite large. As a result, experimental <br />adaptive management actions designed to increa<;e recruit- <br />ment should consider first and foremost how to achieve large <br />changes in recruitment. Small-scale experimental treatments <br />of short duration, or so-called "mini-experiments," should be <br />summarily discounted recognizing that the monitoring pro- <br />gram is unlikely to detect small recruitment change even if it <br />occurs. Additionally, multiyear experiments should be strongly <br />favored in order to help offset not only unexpected and uncon- <br />trollable effects, but the low precision in recruitment estimates. <br /> <br />Acknowledgements <br /> <br />For their thorough review of the GCMRC assessment <br />methodology, I would like to thank members of the Hump- <br />back Chub Assessment Review Panel: James F. Kitchell, <br />Churchill Grimes, Steven T. Lindley, David Otis, and Carl <br />Schwarz. Steve Martell is acknowledged for his help and <br />council in developing ADMB programs and conceptualizing <br />how to incorporate ageing elTor into the cun'ent assessment <br />program. Carl Walters, Bill Pine, Mike Allen, and Tom Frazer <br />are deserving of thanks for early reviews and suggestions <br />that much improved this manuscript. I would also like to <br />thank Tina Kister and Lara Schmit for publication assistance. <br />Finally. and perhaps most deservedly, my thanks to field crews <br />past and present whose tireless efforts provide the data upon <br />which this assessment relies completely. <br /> <br />References <br /> <br />Akaike, H.x., 1973, Information theory as an extension of the <br />maximum likelihood principle, in Petrov, B.N., and Csaki, <br />F., eds., Intemational symposium on information theory, <br />2nd, Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, 1973 [Proceedings], p. <br />267-281. <br />