My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9710
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
9710
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:28:21 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:13:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9710
Author
Connolly, P.J., I.G. Jezorek, K.D. Martens and E.F. Prentice.
Title
Measuring the performance of two stationary interrogation systems for detecting downstream and upstream movement of PIT-tagged salmonids.
USFW Year
2008.
USFW - Doc Type
North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PERFORMANCE OF PIT TAG INTERROGATION SYSTEMS <br /> <br />403 <br /> <br />been performed to determine the efficiency of <br />interrogation systems for detecting PIT-tagged fish. <br />When studies have been done, they have generally <br />used fish that have a high propensity to move <br />downstream or upstream in relative unison during <br />some part of their life history. Efficiency has been <br />calculated for stationary interrogation systems using <br />downstream traps to confirnl that fish have passed an <br />interrogator, or by having a known number of fish <br />tagged upstream of a detector and then assuming all <br />emigrate past the intelTOgator. <br />There have been substantial efforts to document <br />efficiency using experimental channels and dam <br />facilities. Nunnallee et al. (1998) evaluated efficiency <br />of a PIT tag interrogation system in a fish collection <br />channel using a direct method whereby a known <br />number of fish passed the detector, and by an indirect <br />method whereby detections at other antennas were <br />compared with detections at the system being evalu- <br />ated. They calculated efficiencies for detecting PIT- <br />tagged salmonids to be 97% using the direct method <br />and 99% using the indirect method. Using similar <br />direct and indirect methods. Axel et al. (2005) found <br />detection efficiencies of a tour-antenna system around <br />a large bypass pipe (91.4 cm diameter) to be close to <br />100% for tagged salmonids. In an experimental <br />fishway study, Castro-Santos et aI. (1996) used four <br />arrays of one antenna each and found the detection <br />efficiencies for three c1upeid species known to have <br />passed their detector system to be 96% in a Denil-type <br />fishway and 88% in a Steeppass-type fishway. In a <br />study of juvenile Atlantic salmon Salmo salar in an <br />artificial channel off the River Itchen in the United <br />Kingdom, Riley et al. (2002) found detection efficiency <br />of downstream-moving fish to be 70%, but detectors at <br />each of three exit points (two exit points had two <br />antennas, one exit had one antenna) were combined to <br />determine an overall efficiency rate. Though upstream <br />movement was detected, they were not able to calculate <br />efficiency for upstream-moving fish. Using captures of <br />fish at a trap downstream of a detection site (two 4-m <br />X 1.2-m, side-by-side upright antenna~), Zydlewski <br />et aI. (2001) found downstream detection efficiency to <br />be 93% for juvenile Atlantic salmon. For cases when a <br />known number of fish have passed an interrogator, <br />Zydlewski et al. (2006) described a method for <br />calculating the detection efficiency, but not the <br />variance. In general, these findings indicate that <br />stationary interrogation systems have potential to be <br />highly effective in modified chlmnel systems, but <br />alternate methodologies for estimating detection effi- <br />ciency and its variability have been lacking. <br />In most of the previous studies referred to above, <br />detector systems were placed where flow was restricted <br /> <br />by pipes or fish ways or at stream pinch points such as <br />bridges or culverts. In some cases, researchers have <br />modified the stream channel to force fish through or <br />near antennas (Greenberg and Giller 2000; Riley et aI. <br />2003; Zydlewski et aI. 2006). While it may be possible <br />to direct all water and fish at specific sites, we saw the <br />need to develop an intelTOgation system that could be <br />adapted to free-flowing streams in remote locations <br />without reliance on existing structures (e.g., culverts <br />and bridges) or modifying the channel. <br />Despite attempts to direct fish past instream PIT tag <br />antennas, tag detection efficiency is likely to be less <br />than 100% for a number of reasons. Fish behavior can <br />change with changes in stream conditions, and <br />alternate passage routes can provide fish opportunities <br />to pass beyond a detection field. The electrical <br />properties of a PIT tag interrogation system can change <br />with changes in water level, which may partially or <br />completely expose an antenna to air, and with changes <br />in water temperature, conductivity, and air tempemture. <br />These changes can compromise a system's ability and <br />consistency to detect tags. However, this latter problem <br />can be partially or completely solved by using <br />transceivers that automatically change their settings <br />(self tune) to changing environmental conditions, thus <br />improving petformance. A system's ability to read tags <br />can also be compromised by ambient electromagnetic <br />fields (EMFs) of similar frequency, which can be <br />generated by nearby power lines, electric fences, <br />pumps, or electrical devices in homes or businesses <br />(Zydlewski et a1. 2006). This intetference can be steady <br />or changing depending upon the noise source (Horton <br />et aI. 2(07). Because the present systems cannot read <br />two tags at once, multiple fish swimming through or <br />holding in the detection field at the same time can <br />compromise the ability to detect a tag (Greenberg and <br />Giller 2000). Because of these and possibly other <br />factors, investigators may need to determine detection <br />efficiencies during discrete periods of differing condi- <br />tions (Horton et al. 2007). <br />The objectives of our study were to (1) describe a <br />protocol for identifying active juvenile and adult <br />salmonid migrants, (2) estimate the magnitude and <br />variance of detection efficiency, (3) evaluate the effect <br />of the direction of fish movement and stream flow on <br />detection efficiency, and (4) explore the effect of <br />antenna configuration on detection efficiency. We <br />describe the tag-reading efficiencies, with estimates of <br />variability, achieved by two similar PIT tag interroga- <br />tion systems designed to (1) maximize detection of <br />tagged fish, (2) distinguish between downstream and <br />upstream movements, (3) be readily adaptable to remote <br />stream sites, and (4) not be dependent on full-stream <br />coverage. We describe an indirect method for deriving <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.