Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PERFORMANCE OF PIT TAG INTERROGATION SYSTEMS <br /> <br />403 <br /> <br />been performed to determine the efficiency of <br />interrogation systems for detecting PIT-tagged fish. <br />When studies have been done, they have generally <br />used fish that have a high propensity to move <br />downstream or upstream in relative unison during <br />some part of their life history. Efficiency has been <br />calculated for stationary interrogation systems using <br />downstream traps to confirnl that fish have passed an <br />interrogator, or by having a known number of fish <br />tagged upstream of a detector and then assuming all <br />emigrate past the intelTOgator. <br />There have been substantial efforts to document <br />efficiency using experimental channels and dam <br />facilities. Nunnallee et al. (1998) evaluated efficiency <br />of a PIT tag interrogation system in a fish collection <br />channel using a direct method whereby a known <br />number of fish passed the detector, and by an indirect <br />method whereby detections at other antennas were <br />compared with detections at the system being evalu- <br />ated. They calculated efficiencies for detecting PIT- <br />tagged salmonids to be 97% using the direct method <br />and 99% using the indirect method. Using similar <br />direct and indirect methods. Axel et al. (2005) found <br />detection efficiencies of a tour-antenna system around <br />a large bypass pipe (91.4 cm diameter) to be close to <br />100% for tagged salmonids. In an experimental <br />fishway study, Castro-Santos et aI. (1996) used four <br />arrays of one antenna each and found the detection <br />efficiencies for three c1upeid species known to have <br />passed their detector system to be 96% in a Denil-type <br />fishway and 88% in a Steeppass-type fishway. In a <br />study of juvenile Atlantic salmon Salmo salar in an <br />artificial channel off the River Itchen in the United <br />Kingdom, Riley et al. (2002) found detection efficiency <br />of downstream-moving fish to be 70%, but detectors at <br />each of three exit points (two exit points had two <br />antennas, one exit had one antenna) were combined to <br />determine an overall efficiency rate. Though upstream <br />movement was detected, they were not able to calculate <br />efficiency for upstream-moving fish. Using captures of <br />fish at a trap downstream of a detection site (two 4-m <br />X 1.2-m, side-by-side upright antenna~), Zydlewski <br />et aI. (2001) found downstream detection efficiency to <br />be 93% for juvenile Atlantic salmon. For cases when a <br />known number of fish have passed an interrogator, <br />Zydlewski et al. (2006) described a method for <br />calculating the detection efficiency, but not the <br />variance. In general, these findings indicate that <br />stationary interrogation systems have potential to be <br />highly effective in modified chlmnel systems, but <br />alternate methodologies for estimating detection effi- <br />ciency and its variability have been lacking. <br />In most of the previous studies referred to above, <br />detector systems were placed where flow was restricted <br /> <br />by pipes or fish ways or at stream pinch points such as <br />bridges or culverts. In some cases, researchers have <br />modified the stream channel to force fish through or <br />near antennas (Greenberg and Giller 2000; Riley et aI. <br />2003; Zydlewski et aI. 2006). While it may be possible <br />to direct all water and fish at specific sites, we saw the <br />need to develop an intelTOgation system that could be <br />adapted to free-flowing streams in remote locations <br />without reliance on existing structures (e.g., culverts <br />and bridges) or modifying the channel. <br />Despite attempts to direct fish past instream PIT tag <br />antennas, tag detection efficiency is likely to be less <br />than 100% for a number of reasons. Fish behavior can <br />change with changes in stream conditions, and <br />alternate passage routes can provide fish opportunities <br />to pass beyond a detection field. The electrical <br />properties of a PIT tag interrogation system can change <br />with changes in water level, which may partially or <br />completely expose an antenna to air, and with changes <br />in water temperature, conductivity, and air tempemture. <br />These changes can compromise a system's ability and <br />consistency to detect tags. However, this latter problem <br />can be partially or completely solved by using <br />transceivers that automatically change their settings <br />(self tune) to changing environmental conditions, thus <br />improving petformance. A system's ability to read tags <br />can also be compromised by ambient electromagnetic <br />fields (EMFs) of similar frequency, which can be <br />generated by nearby power lines, electric fences, <br />pumps, or electrical devices in homes or businesses <br />(Zydlewski et a1. 2006). This intetference can be steady <br />or changing depending upon the noise source (Horton <br />et aI. 2(07). Because the present systems cannot read <br />two tags at once, multiple fish swimming through or <br />holding in the detection field at the same time can <br />compromise the ability to detect a tag (Greenberg and <br />Giller 2000). Because of these and possibly other <br />factors, investigators may need to determine detection <br />efficiencies during discrete periods of differing condi- <br />tions (Horton et al. 2007). <br />The objectives of our study were to (1) describe a <br />protocol for identifying active juvenile and adult <br />salmonid migrants, (2) estimate the magnitude and <br />variance of detection efficiency, (3) evaluate the effect <br />of the direction of fish movement and stream flow on <br />detection efficiency, and (4) explore the effect of <br />antenna configuration on detection efficiency. We <br />describe the tag-reading efficiencies, with estimates of <br />variability, achieved by two similar PIT tag interroga- <br />tion systems designed to (1) maximize detection of <br />tagged fish, (2) distinguish between downstream and <br />upstream movements, (3) be readily adaptable to remote <br />stream sites, and (4) not be dependent on full-stream <br />coverage. We describe an indirect method for deriving <br />