Laserfiche WebLink
<br />412 <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />90 <br /> <br />'i: <br />--- <br /> <br />>.. <br />g 80 <br />(l) <br />'0 <br />:E <br />ell <br />c <br />.2 70 <br />t) <br />Q) <br />...... <br />ell <br />a <br /> <br />60 <br /> <br />CONNOLLY ET AL. <br /> <br />Rattlesnake Creek Beaver Creek <br />Downstream moving fish <br /> <br />C> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 50 <br /> A B C A B c <br /> Upstream moving fish <br /> 100 <br /> Cb <br /> 90 <br />-.. (J) <br />~ <br />c <br />--- <br />>.. <br />u <br />c 80 <br />Q) <br />'0 <br />:E <br />ell <br />c <br />0 70 <br />U <br />(l) <br />- <br />ell <br />a <br /> 60 (lI}..... Low flow <br /> ___ High flow <br /> 50 <br /> A B C A B C <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />FIGURE 7.-Efticiency of detection of PIT-tagged tish moving upstream and downstream in Rattlesnake and Beaver creeks <br />under high- and low-tlow conditions using a three-array, six-antenna configuration. Arrays A and C consisted of two side-by- <br />side pass-by antennas, array B of two side-by-side hybrid antennas. <br />