Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Reisenbichler RR, Rubin SP (1999) Genetic changes from artificial <br />propagation of Pacific salmon affect the productivity and viabil- <br />ity of supplemented populations. ICES Journal of Marine Science, <br />56,459-466. <br />Robertson A (1964) The effect of non-random mating within inbred <br />lines on the rate of inbreeding. Genetical Research, 5, 164-167. <br />Rodriguez-Ramilo ST, Perez-Figuero A, Fernandez B, Fernandez <br />J, Caballero A (2004) Mutation-selection balance accounting for <br />genetic variation for viability in Drosophila melanogaster as <br />deduced from an inbreeding and artificial selection experiment. <br />Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17, 528-541. <br />Seal US (1991) Life after extinction. In: Beyond Captive Breeding: Re- <br />Introducing Endangered Mammals to the Wild (ed. Gipps JHW), <br />pp. 39-55. Zoological Society of London, Oxford, UK. <br />Serena M (1995) Reintroduction Biology of Australian and New Zea- <br />land Fauna. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, New South <br />Wales, Australia. <br />Snyder NFR, Derrickson SR, Beissinger SR et al. (1996) Limitations <br />of captive breeding in endangered species recovery. Conserva- <br />tion Biology, 10, 338-348. <br />Soule ME, Gilpin M, Conway W, Foose T (1986) The millennium <br />ark: how long a voyage, how many staterooms, how many <br />passengers? Zoo Biology, 5, 101-113. <br />Swanson-Wagner RA, Jia Y, DeCook R et al. (2006) All possible <br />modes of gene action are observed in a global comparison of <br />gene expression in a maize F} hybrid and its inbred parents. Pro- <br />ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 6805-6810. <br />Touchell DH, Dixon KW (1993) Cryopreservation of seed of <br />Western Australian native species. Biodiversity and Conservation, <br />2,594-602. <br />Tudge C (1995) Captive audiences for future conservation. <br />New Scientist, 145 (1962), 51-52. <br />Waples RS (1999) Dispelling some myths about hatcheries. Fisheries, <br />24,12-21. <br /> <br />@ 2007 The Author <br />Journal compilation @ 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd <br /> <br />GENETIC ADAPTATION TO CAPTIVITY 9 <br /> <br />Weber KE, Diggins LT (1990) Increased selection response in <br />larger populations. II. Selection for eth,lnol vapor resistance in <br />Drosophila melanogaster, at two population sizes. Genetics, 125, <br />585-597. <br />Wilson AC, Stanley Price MR (1994) Reintroduction as a reason for <br />captive breeding, In: Creative Conservation: Interactive Manage- <br />ment of Wild and Captive Animals (eds Olney PJS, Mace GM, <br />Feistner ATC), pp. 243-264. Chapman & Hall, London. <br />Wilson MH, Kepler CB, Snyder NFR et al. (1994) Puerto Rican <br />parrots and potential limitations of the metapopulation <br />approach to species conservation. Conservation Biology, 8, <br />114-123. <br />Wolf CM, Griffith B, Reed C, Temple SA (1996) Avian and mam- <br />malian translocations: update and reanalysis of 1987 survey <br />data. Conservation Biology, 10, 1142-1154. <br />Woodford MH, Rossiter PB (1994) Disease risks associated <br />with wildlife translocation projects. In: Creative Conservation: <br />Interactive Management of Wild and Captive Animals (eds Olney <br />PJS, Mace GM, Feistner ATC), pp. 178-200. Chapman & Hall, <br />London. <br />Woodworth LM, Montgomery ME, Briscoe DA. Frankham R <br />(2002) Rapid genetic deterioration in captivity: causes and con- <br />servation implications. Conservation Genetics, 3, 277-288. <br />Zouros E, Loukas M, Economopoulos A, Mazomenos B (1982) <br />Selection at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus of the olive fruit fly <br />Dacus oleae under artificial rearing. Heredity, 48, 169-185. <br /> <br />Richard Frankham and coworkers have been engaged since 1990 <br />in research in conservation genetics encompassing modelling <br />problems using Drosophila, meta-analyses and computer simulations. <br />He has written two textbook in the field in collaboration with <br />Jonathan Ballou and David Briscoe. <br />