Laserfiche WebLink
<br />GREEN RIVER STUDY PLAN <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />February 2, 2007 <br /> <br />Integration and synthesis of existing data on larval presence in the river and a correlation <br />of these data with flow and temperature conditions plus sediment dynamics (e.g., project 85f, <br />SWMS model) is recommended to gain a better understanding of this relationship. Otolith <br />analyses performed as part of this study should be continued to determine the age and growth of <br />young razorback suckers (e.g., Muth et al. 1998; Bestgen et al. 2002). This information will help <br />to determine the timing of reproduction by razorback suckers and hatching of larvae to better <br />understand cues for spawning, and to more accurately pinpoint factors that affect availability and <br />abundance of naturally produced larvae. In addition, this sampling will provide ancillary data to <br />evaluate reproductive viability of stocked razorback suckers. <br /> <br />Hypotheses to Be Evaluated and Information Needs to Be Filled <br /> <br />· Temporal relationships between drifting larvae, hydrology, and sediment dynamics <br />needed to entrain larvae in floodplains (UI0); and <br /> <br />· Benefits of lower peak flows for longer duration vs. higher peak flow for a shorter <br />duration for a given volume (U14). <br /> <br />Implementation <br /> <br />· Ongoing Project 22F.-Project 22F (annual larval monitoring) should be revised to <br />include an evaluation of temporal patterns of larval presence in the river and the <br />relationship of larval presence to flow and temperature conditions. Monitoring would <br />continue indefinitely. The need for modifications of monitoring protocols and the need <br />for continued monitoring would be evaluated periodically. <br /> <br />· New Start.-Perform analysis of historical monitoring data (2001 and later) to determine <br />temporal patterns of larval presence in the river and the relationship of larval presence to <br />flow, sediment, and temperature conditions. This project should be started in FY 2008 <br />and completed in FY 2009. <br /> <br />3.3.2 Backwater Formation and Maintenance for Y oun!! Colorado Pikeminnow <br /> <br />Backwaters are important in-channel habitats for endangered Colorado River fishes <br />particularly in Reaches 2 and 3, although releases from Flaming Gorge Dam primarily affect <br />habitats in Reaches 1 and 2. Backwaters are low-velocity, productive environments that serve as <br />nursery habitat for age-O Colorado pikeminnow. Colorado pikeminnow spawn from late June to <br />early August, and newly emerged larvae drift downstream during the descending limb of spring <br />runoff to become entrained in main channel backwaters. These fish generally remain in <br />backwaters until the following spring runoff when these habitats are inundated by high flows. <br /> <br />Young Colorado pikeminnow frequently use these habitats for shelter and feeding. <br />Nonnative fish also use these habitats and compete with and prey on especially the young <br />pikeminnow. Peak flows reshape the channel annually, and are important in the formation and <br />maintenance of these habitats. Peak flows and the descending limb of the peak flow hydro graph <br />are also important in establishing the elevation at which backwaters form. This elevation <br />determines the base flows at which backwater habitat availability is optimized. The effect of <br />