Laserfiche WebLink
<br />GREEN RIVER STUDY PLAN <br /> <br />26 <br /> <br />February 2, 2007 <br /> <br />by the river. These floodplains provide shelter from swift river currents, are highly productive, <br />and provide warm sheltered habitats for growth. Larval and age-O bonytails may also use these <br />habitats as nurseries. Additionally, juvenile and adult razorback suckers, Colorado <br />pikeminnows, and bonytails use these habitats for feeding and shelter. Floodplains tend to be. <br />warmer than the main channel in the spring, and gonadal maturation is enhanced in adult fish <br />that use them. Reach 2, especially from Split Mountain to the White River confluence, is the <br />most important reach of the Green River for floodplain habitat (Valdez and Nelson 2004). The <br />only known spawning bar for wild razorback suckers is located near the upstream end of this <br />reach, and downstream floodplains are vital nurseries for entrained larvae. <br /> <br />The quality of these floodplains is important to the survival, growth, and subsequent <br />movement of subadult razorback suckers to the mainstem. The importance of a floodplain as <br />nursery habitat is thought to be related to the river stage at which it connects to the mainstem, <br />depth of water remaining after peak flows recede, water quality, length of time water sufficient <br />to support fish is retained, frequency of connection from year to year, rate of sediment deposition <br />and erosion in the habitat, larval entrainment rates into the habitat, survival and growth of young <br />fish in the habitat, the ability of fish to move into the mainstem once they have reached sufficient <br />size, and species and numbers of nonnative fish that occur in the habitat. <br /> <br />Recent studies of floodplains in both the Upper Basin and Lower Basin have yielded <br />much information about various aspects of floodplains, but information needs remain that must <br />be filled before flow and temperature regimes can be developed to assist in species recovery. <br />Ongoing and planned studies help to address some of these needs, but information needs remain <br />that preclude best management of flow and temperature for properly functioning floodplains. <br />The positive response by nonnative fish to floodplain restoration continues to be problematic and <br />should be considered and addressed as part of any habitat restoration effort. Nonnative fish are <br />an integral factor in determining the quality of a floodplain. <br /> <br />Floodplain inundation for larval entrainment, rearing, and subsequent movement of <br />subadult razorback suckers into the mainstem in Reach 2 were identified as the most important <br />issues related to evaluation of the flow and temperature recommendations. The upper end of <br />Reach 3 (i.e., White River confluence to Sand Wash) also has large floodplain terraces that may <br />be important razorback sucker nurseries. Floodplain nursery habitats in Reach 3 downstream of <br />Desolation/Gray Canyons are not plentiful and are only available at very high flows <br />(> 39,000 cfs). <br /> <br />Nine high priority hypotheses related to floodplains were identified for evaluation <br />(Table 2). The recommended studies that address each identified anticipated effect, uncertainty, <br />and information need are identified in the remainder of this section. Recommended studies <br />include continuation of ongoing studies that need to be completed before decisions on future <br />studies are made through an adaptive learning process. Recommended studies fall into three <br />subject areas: (l) evaluation of survival and recruitment, (2) entrainment rates, and (3) the timing <br />of larval drift. <br />