My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9705
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9705
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:58 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:12:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9705
Author
Green River Study Plan ad hoc Committee.
Title
Study plan for the implementation and evaluation of flow and temperature recommendations for endangered fishes in the Green River downstream of Flaming Gorge Dam.
USFW Year
2007.
USFW - Doc Type
Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />GREEN RIVER STUDY PLAN <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />February 2,2007 <br /> <br />· Final Programmatic Biological Opinion on the Management Plan for Endangered Fishes <br />in the Yampa River Basin (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2004). <br /> <br />· Consideration of Site-specific Floodplain Inundation Thresholds in Implementing Peak <br />Flow Magnitude and Duration Recommendations in the Middle Green River, Utah <br />(Hayse et al. 2005). <br /> <br />2.0 METHODS <br /> <br />2.1 Steps in Study Plan Development <br /> <br />The following steps were taken to develop this plan (Figure 3). <br /> <br />1. Anticipated effects or uncertainties were identified from the authority or guidance <br />documents described in Sections 1.2.1 and 1.2.2. <br /> <br />2. Ongoing or pending studies were identified that were related to each anticipated effect or <br />uncertainty . <br /> <br />3. With input from the principal investigators, goals and objectives of each study were <br />examined to determine how well the studies address an anticipated effect or uncertainty. <br /> <br />4. Important information needs associated with each anticipated effect or uncertainty were <br />identified and revised ongoing or new studies were recommended to fill those needs. <br /> <br />5. Authority, guidance, and other documents were used to screen information needs and to <br />prioritize studies. <br /> <br />6. Recommendations were formulated for the Recovery Program to incorporate into the <br />RlPRAP. <br /> <br />2.2 Linkage of Studies to Anticipated Effects and Uncertainties <br /> <br />This Study Plan identifies primary and supporting monitoring or research studies that <br />evaluate to varying degrees the anticipated effects or uncertainties related to the flow and <br />temperature recommendations. The anticipated effects and uncertainties are identified in <br />Appendix Tables AI-A3 for each reach of the Green River and for spring peak and base flow <br />periods. The language for the general flow and temperature recommendations was taken from <br />Muth et al. (2000). The anticipated effects were taken from the flow and temperature <br />recommendations. Uncertainties were taken from the flow and temperature recommendations, <br />BA, BO, FEIS, ROD, and various other documents. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.