Laserfiche WebLink
<br />GREEN RIVER STUDY PLAN <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />February 2,2007 <br /> <br />· Final Programmatic Biological Opinion on the Management Plan for Endangered Fishes <br />in the Yampa River Basin (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2004). <br /> <br />· Consideration of Site-specific Floodplain Inundation Thresholds in Implementing Peak <br />Flow Magnitude and Duration Recommendations in the Middle Green River, Utah <br />(Hayse et al. 2005). <br /> <br />2.0 METHODS <br /> <br />2.1 Steps in Study Plan Development <br /> <br />The following steps were taken to develop this plan (Figure 3). <br /> <br />1. Anticipated effects or uncertainties were identified from the authority or guidance <br />documents described in Sections 1.2.1 and 1.2.2. <br /> <br />2. Ongoing or pending studies were identified that were related to each anticipated effect or <br />uncertainty . <br /> <br />3. With input from the principal investigators, goals and objectives of each study were <br />examined to determine how well the studies address an anticipated effect or uncertainty. <br /> <br />4. Important information needs associated with each anticipated effect or uncertainty were <br />identified and revised ongoing or new studies were recommended to fill those needs. <br /> <br />5. Authority, guidance, and other documents were used to screen information needs and to <br />prioritize studies. <br /> <br />6. Recommendations were formulated for the Recovery Program to incorporate into the <br />RlPRAP. <br /> <br />2.2 Linkage of Studies to Anticipated Effects and Uncertainties <br /> <br />This Study Plan identifies primary and supporting monitoring or research studies that <br />evaluate to varying degrees the anticipated effects or uncertainties related to the flow and <br />temperature recommendations. The anticipated effects and uncertainties are identified in <br />Appendix Tables AI-A3 for each reach of the Green River and for spring peak and base flow <br />periods. The language for the general flow and temperature recommendations was taken from <br />Muth et al. (2000). The anticipated effects were taken from the flow and temperature <br />recommendations. Uncertainties were taken from the flow and temperature recommendations, <br />BA, BO, FEIS, ROD, and various other documents. <br />