Laserfiche WebLink
<br />GREEN RIVER STUDY PLAN <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />February 2, 2007 <br /> <br />3. Razorback Sucker <br />a. Spawning bar complexes (Split Mountain Canyon to Desolation Canyon) <br />· Same as those identified for Desolation and Gray Canyons reach under <br />overall reach-habitat priorities above. <br />· Location of additional potential spawning areas in reach. <br />b. Flooded bottomlands (Split Mountain Canyon to Desolation Canyon) <br />. Same as those identified for Split Mountain Canyon to Desolation Canyon <br />reach under overall reach-habitat priorities above." <br /> <br />Green River Subbasin Floodplain Management Plan <br /> <br />In 2004, the Recovery Program issued Green River Subbasin Floodplain Management <br />Plan (Valdez and Nelson 2004). This plan was developed in order for the Recovery Program to <br />establish goals, identify management actions, and to gage progress on habitat restoration and <br />protection. Implementation of this management plan is one means by which the Recovery <br />Program achieves floodplain-related recovery criteria and management actions. The goal of this <br />plan was to provide adequate floodplain habitats for all life stages of razorback sucker, <br />particularly to serve as nursery areas for larvae and juveniles, for establishment and maintenance <br />of self-sustaining populations. <br /> <br />The floodplain management plan identified the following uncertainties, research needs, <br />and recommendations (summarized). <br /> <br />Uncertainties <br /> <br />1. Effectiveness and alternatives for the "reset theory" in which floodplains are allowed to <br />inundate and desiccate on a 12 or 24-month cycle to provide productive habitats for <br />maximum growth of razorback sucker with escapement to the river, and to periodically <br />kill nonnative fishes that are entrained in these habitats. <br /> <br />2. Entrainment of wild razorback sucker larvae is critical to species recovery, but drift <br />characteristics and entrainment are not well understood. <br /> <br />3. Growth and survival over a 12 to 24-month period must be sufficient to minimize the risk <br />of predation and for razorback sucker to recruit to the adult portion of the population. <br /> <br />4. Short-term floodplains may have little value as nurseries but may be used transiently by <br />large juvenile and adult razorback sucker, bonytail, and Colorado pikeminnow. <br /> <br />5. The reset strategy of cyclic inundation/desiccation of floodplains may enhance growth <br />and survival of razorback sucker and negate the effect of production of nonnative fishes <br />in these habitats. <br />