Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Statistical Analysis <br />Wl' lllnducted nine trials to compare mortality of exercised and control razorbacks. We <br />compared the number of fish eaten of a total possible ten fish for each treatment (20 prey per trial). <br />Mean mortality of exercised razorback sucker (3.33 :!: 0.62 SE) was significantly lower than control fish <br />(5.11 :!: 0.74 SE) (fig. 10; one-tailed Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs Ranks test; n = 9, z = 1.69, p = 0.046). <br /> <br />70 <br />60 <br />c: <br />S 50 <br />~ <br />Q) <br />Q) 40 <br />C'l <br />~ 30 <br />c: <br />Q) <br />~ 20 <br />Q) <br />0.. 10 <br />o <br /> <br /> <br />Control <br /> <br />Treated <br /> <br />Control <br /> <br />Treated <br /> <br />2006 <br /> <br />2007 <br /> <br />Figure 10. Percent mortality of razorback suckers (mean :t 95 percent Confidence limits) per treatment <br />in 2006 and 2007. Treatment fish in 2006 were exercised only; treatment fish in 2007 were exercised and <br />exposed to a predator event. In both years, treatment fish had significantly lower mortality than control <br />fish (p<0.051. <br /> <br />Predation Trials-2007 <br /> <br />Razorback Suckers <br />The first year we focused on testing whether flow conditioning increased a razorback sucker's <br />escape performance. The second year our primary objective was to determine if an exposure to a <br />predation event improved survival compared to predator-naiVe fish. Twenty-three trials were conducted <br />from April 10 to June 26, 2007. Initially, we mimicked the previous year's approach of using study <br />groups of ten fish and allowing the predators whatever time necessary to reduce that number by half. <br />However. the first two trials took nearly six nights to complete. During that period, we observed the <br />I <\/mhad ~lIders schlloling and realized that after the first evening, all these fish had some degree of <br />ptL'dalor experience. Avoidance behavior between the treated and control suckers would be most <br />prevalent during the first encounter and decreased each consec'utive night as fish were subjected to <br />repeated predator aggression. We modified our study design to shorten the duration of the predation trial <br />to one or two days by using smaller groups. As a result we increased our intended number of trials from <br />IOlon. <br /> <br />15 <br />