Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Green River Floodplain Inundation <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />June 2005 <br /> <br />1 INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />As part of the ongoing effort to recover endangered fishes in the Upper Colorado River <br />Basin, flow and temperature recommendations were developed for the Green River downstream <br />of Flaming Gorge Dam (Muth et al. 2000). The goal of these recommendations was to provide <br />seasonal and annual patterns of flow and temperature in the Green River that would enhance <br />populations of endangered fishes. The recommendations identified the desired magnitude, <br />duration, and timing of both spring peak flows and summer through winter base flows for three <br />reaches of the river under various hydrologic conditions, as well as recommendations related to <br />water temperatures. <br /> <br />Floodplain areas inundated and temporarily cOlmected to the main channel by spring peak <br />flows appear to be important habitats for all life stages of razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus), <br />and the seasonal timing of razorback sucker reproduction suggests an adaptation for utilizing <br />these habitats. The frequency, magnitude, and duration of seasonal overbank: flooding in the <br />Green River has been substantially affected by the operation of Flaming Gorge Dam and by the <br />formation and construction of levees between floodplains and the main channel. It is anticipated <br />that restoring access to these warm and productive habitats, which are most abundant inthe reach <br />between Split Mountain and the upstream end of Desolation Canyon, would provide growth and <br />conditioning environments that are important for the recovery of self-sustaining razorback sucker <br />populations. <br /> <br />For Reach 2(1) of the Green River, Muth et al. (2000) recommended that peak flows be of <br />sufficient magnitude, duration, and frequency to provide inundation of floodplain habitats, <br />provide access to those floodplains by razorback sucker larvae, and allow escapement of older <br />individuals that had matured in those habitats. Additional considerations included peak flows <br />that were sufficient in magnitude and frequency to maintain in-channel habitats. <br /> <br />Although inundation of floodplain habitats is considered most important for recruitment <br />of the razorback sucker, it has been hypothesized that such inundation would benefit all native <br />fish species by providing growth and conditioning environments and by restoring ecological <br />processes dependent on periodic river-floodplain connections. Muth et al. (2000) recognized that <br />access to floodplain habitats could be achieved through a combination of increased peak flows, <br />extended peak-flow duration, lower bank: or levee heights, and constructed inlets. The flow level <br />necessary for floodplain inundation varies by reach, but flow recommendations focused on the <br />portion of Reach 2 within Ouray National Wildlife Refuge and the upper portion of Reach 3(2) <br />between the White River and upper end of Desolation Canyon because the largest expanse of <br />potentially flooded habitat occurs in these areas. <br /> <br />Muth et al. (2000) recommended that information from new research should be used in <br />an adaptive-management framework to refme flow recommendations. In this paper, we draw on <br /> <br />(I) Reach 2 is defmed as the Green River from the confluence of the Yampa River to confluence of the White River. <br />(2) Reach 3 is defined as the Green River between the confluence of the White River and the confluence of the <br />Colorado River. <br />