My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9696
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9696
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:58 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:10:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9696
Author
Korte, N.E.
Title
Selenium poisoning of wildlife and western agriculture
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
cause and effect.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Although enhanced by irrigation in some areas, these data indicate that selenium exposures have <br />always occurred in the region. <br />The report by Hamilton (1998) also notes that the fish congregated in irrigation drainages that <br />exposed them to high levels of selenium that he believes harmed their reproduction. However, <br />reports that the fish used these areas go back to the 1920s (Quartarone 1995) indicating that such <br />locations probably have been used since irrigation began in 1915. <br />Considering the selenium concentrations observed in the early and present-day historical accounts <br />of irrigation water, it is worthwhile to consider data reported for an exposure in North Carolina. <br />Concentrations of selenium of 150 to 200 gg/L flowed into Belew's Lake raising the <br />concentration in the lake to 8-22 gg/L (Skorupa 1998). Immediate effects were observed, <br />including drastic declines in fish populations and increased numbers of deformed fish. However, <br />as described above, higher concentrations of selenium were observed. in the Upper Colorado <br />Basin, including within the rivers themselves, and neither deformed fish nor immediate <br />population declines were observed. (More discussion of contaminant levels that affect the fish is <br />provided in Sects. 3, 5, and 6.) <br />Hamilton (1998) suggests that the fish staged in the irrigation ditches before making their <br />spawning run and probably absorbed significant selenium. An alternate consideration is that <br />water levels and dilution would have been highest prior to the spawning run. The fish spawn in <br />response to spring floods when the selenium should have been diluted such that exposure may not <br />have been as great. According to Kidd (WestWater Engineering Inc. 1996), important rearing <br />habitat for razorback suckers "had a source of water other than the Colorado River itself, and did <br />not depend entirely upon the river flow to maintain their water level." Based on the comments of <br />Stephens and Waddell (1998) above, that could mean that selenium concentrations were typically <br />highest in their preferred habitats where they were formerly abundant. <br />1.5.1.2 Abundance and Decline of the Fish <br />The timing of the decline of the fish populations is debatable and apparently varies from one river <br />system to another and, perhaps, from one section of the river to another. A report reviewed by <br />Hamilton (1998) indicates that the endangered fish were rare in the Upper Colorado Basin after <br />1930, but in previous decades had been numerous (Dill 1944). On the other hand, a fisheries <br />biologist who commonly collected baitfish from backwaters in the Upper Colorado Basin reports <br />that razorback suckers were numerous and had to be "kicked out of the way" when wading <br />through some flooded bottomlands in the early 1970s (Kidd, G., Northwest Fisheries, personal <br />communication, May 25, 1999). Two 24-hour net sets caught 16 razorbacks at this location in <br />1974. Single net sets, after road construction altered this location in 1975 and 1976, resulted in <br />six and zero razorbacks, respectively (Kidd 1977). According to Mr. Kidd, razorbacks were <br />spawning and various age classes were present between 1971 and 1980, observations were <br />verified by another researcher (WestWater Engineering Inc. 1996). A member of the recovery <br />program also stated that there were frequent reports that razorbacks and squawfish were common <br />in the early 1970s (Pfeiffer, F., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, personal communication, Sept. 22, <br />1999). If the pikeminnow (squawfish) and. razorback sucker were relatively common-if not <br />abundant in the early 1970s in the Grand Valley-the question that arises is whether the <br />populations at this time were only big enough to be noticed but not viable. In other words, was <br />the apparent persistence of the fish long after high selenium exposures had. begun a result of their <br />longevity, or did the habitat changes in the 1970s deliver the critical blow to their populations?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.