My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9585
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9585
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:58 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:08:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9585
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Inland Salmonid Broodstock Handbook.
USFW Year
n.d.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SECTION 1. GENETICS <br />Enhancement and perpetuation of the resource is the common goal of <br />all fisheries management programs. Genetic considerations are <br />vital to this goal because fish are a product of their genes, the <br />environment, and of the interaction between the two. The genetic <br />characteristics of a given fish population, in concert with the <br />environment, determine the quality and longevity of the fishery <br />resource. Unlike the goals of commercial aquaculture which select <br />for optimum performance in the hatchery environment, fish reared <br />for rehabilitation or restoration purposes must perform in the <br />wild. Fisheries managers must realize that the implementation of <br />many "standard hatchery practices" affect the genetic make-up of <br />fish stocks and impact the potential for survival and performance <br />in the wild. It should always be remembered that one cannot select <br />for traits in the hatchery that will insure performance in the <br />wild. <br />Traditionally, fisheries managers have concentrated on the <br />manipulation of non-genetic parameters to alter~or "improve" the <br />quality of their product. This approach has allowed for <br />inadvertent changes in the genetic make-up of fish stocks. Long- <br />term management implications related to these genetic changes have <br />not been considered. The disregard for the genetic make-up of fish <br />stocks is extremely unfortunate as relatively minor changes in <br />management practices may result in substantial impacts on the <br />genetic integrity of fish stocks. Management activities that do <br />not reflect consideration-for genetic impact can result in changes <br />in the genetic integrity of stocks that may prove difficult if not <br />impossible to rectify. <br />Evolutionary geneticists have long been aware that genetic <br />variation is an important aspect of the genetic make-up of managed <br />fish stocks. The long-term utility of genetic variation is that it <br />allows fish populations to adapt to changing environmental <br />conditions. The genetic diversity of a population is a finite <br />resource that with improper management can be lost. Kincaid, 1976 <br />(1), found that the loss of genetic variation in rainbow trout <br />reduces hatching success, growth, survival, and disease resistance. <br />He found that a 25~ reduction in heterozygosity resulted in a 38~ <br />increase in morphological deformities, a 19~ decrease in fry <br />survival, and a 23~ reduction in weight gain after 364 days. <br />During the past several decades, broodstocks have inadvertently <br />undergone intense genetic selection and manipulation. Despite the <br />best of intentions, management practices have been conducted with <br />little or no understanding of genetic principles and potential <br />genetic ramifications. As a result, a significant portion of the <br />1-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.