My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9554
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9554
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:58 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:05:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9554
Author
Monroe, L. and T. Hedrick.
Title
Northern Pike (Esox lucius) Control in the Middle Green River, Utah 2001-2006.
USFW Year
2008.
USFW - Doc Type
109,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />LIST OF KEY WORDS <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Northern pike, Esox lucius, nonnative removal, cleithra, nonnative fish, middle Green River <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Beginning in 2001, researchers with the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (Division) <br /> <br />in Vernal, UT, began an intensive northern pike (Esox lucius) removal program in razorback <br /> <br /> <br />sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) critical habitat of the middle Green River. Captures of northern pike <br /> <br /> <br />during the Division's basin-wide surveys had increased from 1997 to 2000 and participants in the <br /> <br /> <br />Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (Program) were concerned that large <br /> <br />numbers of pike would threaten recovery of native, endangered fishes in the Green River. <br /> <br />During this effort, crews were asked to capture and remove all northern pike encountered <br /> <br /> <br />and to develop a northern pike control program or methodology, which could subsequently be <br /> <br /> <br />evaluated for its effectiveness. They did this by utilizing multiple gear types: electrofishing, fyke <br /> <br /> <br />netting, and trammel netting. Catch rates were highest for all gear types in 2001 and although <br /> <br />catch rates varied over the course of this study, the overall trend was a gradual reduction (in both <br /> <br />catch rates and numbers removed) from 2001 to 2006. Catch rates in this reach were low <br /> <br />compared with the Yampa River. <br />From 2001 to 2005, researchers collected c1eithra from northern pike and counted annuli <br /> <br />to determine ages. Results of this analysis were grouped into young-of-year, juvenile, and adult <br /> <br /> <br />age classes. Northern pike removed from the middle Green River from 2001 to 2003 were <br /> <br /> <br />predominantly adult fish. In 2004, most fish were juvenile fish, and in 2005, pike were evenly <br /> <br /> <br />distributed between juvenile and adult. Only three pike were identified as young-of-year over the <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.