My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9554
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9554
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:58 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:05:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9554
Author
Monroe, L. and T. Hedrick.
Title
Northern Pike (Esox lucius) Control in the Middle Green River, Utah 2001-2006.
USFW Year
2008.
USFW - Doc Type
109,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />We present one conclusion for each of our study goals and a few additional conclusions <br /> <br />meant to help in making recommendations. <br /> <br />· Capture and remove (lethal) adult northern pike from reaches of the middle Green River. <br /> <br />Over the course of the six years, we removed a total of 414 northern pike captured from <br /> <br />this reach of river. Associated catch rates were 0.60 fish/hour electrofishing, 0.16 <br /> <br /> <br />fish/fyke-net night fyke-netting, and 0.76 fish/hour trammel netting. <br /> <br /> <br />· Reduce the abundance of adult northern pike in the middle Green River. After 2003, this <br /> <br /> <br />objective was changed to "Maintain low occurrence of adult northern pike in the middle <br /> <br /> <br />Green River." In 2001, crews removed 251 northern pike; this number was reduced to 42 <br /> <br /> <br />the following year, and remained around 20 individuals through 2006. Catch-per-unit- <br /> <br /> <br />effort (CPUE) was also highest for all gear types in 2001 and although CPUE for <br /> <br /> <br />electrofishing and fyke-netting varied over the course of the study period, the overall <br /> <br /> <br />trend in all gear types was a decrease in catch rates between 2001 and 2006. <br /> <br /> <br />· Determine the efficacy of removal efforts. Electrofishing catch rates in the middle Green <br /> <br />are consistently lower than those observed in the Yampa River. Catch rates in 2001 were <br /> <br />comparable to those in the middle Yampa River in 2004; however, subsequent catch rates <br /> <br />have decreased more in the Green River than in the Yampa River and did so immediately <br /> <br />after the initial effort in 2001, pointing to a thus far effective removal effort. <br /> <br />· Identify the means and levels of northern pike control necessary to minimize the threat of <br /> <br />predation/competition on endangered and other native fishes. If one concludes that the <br /> <br />northern pike in the middle Green River are coming predominantly from the Yampa <br /> <br />River, only a minimal (i.e., preventative) amount of effort is required to minimize the <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.