Laserfiche WebLink
Conservancy District indicate that from 1986 and 2006, the reservoir regularly filled to the active <br />storage level during the spring and then was drawn down over the remainder of the year. These <br />drawdowns were extensive in dry water years (sometimes as much as 80,000AF, with an average <br />of around 40,000AF). These amounts translate into an elevation reduction of sometimes 10, <br />sometimes nearly 40 feet of overall water elevation in the reservoir. These water level <br />fluctuations could have significant ramifications on the species assemblage escaping from the <br />reservoir with cold water species escaping during spring releases and a cool water assemblage <br />escaping as the reservoir elevation is reduced over the year. Therefore, although study results <br />indicate that escapement rates for smallmouth bass and walleye through the outlet are low (only <br />one smallmouth bass iri 2002; six walleye in 2002 and three in 2004), the potential is there for <br />these species to escape and the potential is also there to underestimate their rate of escapement. <br />Spillway Stilling Basin <br />Comparing the 2005 spillway escapement numbers (not rates) with escapement numbers <br />from the outlet evaluation drainings, smallmouth bass and walleye appear to escape over the <br />spillway in higher numbers than through the outlet. Yellow perch escape from both the outlet <br />works and the spillway, but they appear to escape from the outlet in greater numbers. <br />Given the difficulties with the study, the initial and evaluation drainings in 2002 were <br />considered an effective "initial" draining. In addition, the evaluation draining in 2004 and the <br />initial draining in 2005 were nearly complete at removing all fishes. Thus, the evaluation <br />draining in 2005 was thought to be a valid evaluation of escapement of target species over the <br />spillway. Despite this fact, the spillway basin did refill before crews were able to clear it of all <br />fish, thus there is potential for underestimation of escapement even during the 2005 evaluation <br />draining. Another key feature in the evaluation of escapement, the weir placed in between the <br />15 <br />