My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9549
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9549
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:58 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:03:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9549
Author
Bestgen, K. R., K. A. Zelasko, R. I. Compton and T. Chart.
Title
Response of the Green River Fish Community to Changes in Flow Temperature Regimes from Flaming Gorge Dam since 1996 based on sampling conducted from 2002 to 2004.
USFW Year
2006.
USFW - Doc Type
115,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Stream flow and water temperature data collection and presentation.-Most temperature <br />data were from lower Lodore Canyon and Mitten Park (pers. comm., G. Smith, U. S. Fish and <br />Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado). Flow data were from U. S. Geological Survey gauges. <br />First, we describe the major changes in flow and temperature regimes in Lodore and Whirlpool <br />canyons as a result of construction and operation of Flaming Gorge Dam. We characterized flow <br />differences in the historical period (Lodore Canyon, Greendale gauge, # 09234500, 1951 to <br />1962; Whirlpool Canyon, Jensen gauge # 09261000, 1946 to 1962), a post-impoundment period <br />(1962 to 1991), a post-Biological Opinion period (1992-1996), and a recent (1997 to 2004) <br />period which was thought to represent conditions that affected the fish communities during this <br />investigation. We used the Jensen, Utah gauge to characterize Whirlpool Canyon and Island- <br />Rainbow Park flows because the few small tributaries present between Whirlpool Canyon and <br />the downstream gauge will not affect flow estimates appreciably. <br />Fish sample data analysis and presentation.-Composition of the fish community in the <br />study area (Fig. 1) was calculated for samples collected in the 2002 to 2004 period for each gear <br />type. Longitudinal and temporal shifts in community composition were characterized by <br />partitioning samples into reaches both for small-bodied fishes captured primarily by seining and <br />for large-bodied fishes captured primarily by electrofishing in the periods 1994 to 1996 and 2002 <br />to 2004. Samples were from eight contiguous Green River reaches: a Browns Park reach, four 8- <br />RK Lodore Canyon reaches, upper and lower Whirlpool Canyon reaches (9 and 8 RK) and the <br />Island-Rainbow Park reach (10 RK); electrofishing samples were collected only in Lodore and <br />Whirlpool canyons. <br />Change in numerically dominant native and non-native fishes in reaches was compared <br />among study periods 1994 to 1996 and 2002 to 2004 and reaches to facilitate detection of <br />longitudinal shifts in community composition. We defined relative abundance as the percent <br />composition that a particular species represented in a sample. For seine samples, catch-per-unit- <br />effort (CPUE) was number of fish of a particular species divided by area sampled per seine haul <br />(density). For electrofishing samples, CPUE was number of fish captured per amount of time <br />sampled. For trammel net samples, CPUE was fish captured per net hr. We did not measure <br />11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.