Laserfiche WebLink
Stream flow and water temperature data collection and presentation.-Most temperature <br />data were from lower Lodore Canyon and Mitten Park (pers. comm., G. Smith, U. S. Fish and <br />Wildlife Service, Denver, Colorado). Flow data were from U. S. Geological Survey gauges. <br />First, we describe the major changes in flow and temperature regimes in Lodore and Whirlpool <br />canyons as a result of construction and operation of Flaming Gorge Dam. We characterized flow <br />differences in the historical period (Lodore Canyon, Greendale gauge, # 09234500, 1951 to <br />1962; Whirlpool Canyon, Jensen gauge # 09261000, 1946 to 1962), a post-impoundment period <br />(1962 to 1991), a post-Biological Opinion period (1992-1996), and a recent (1997 to 2004) <br />period which was thought to represent conditions that affected the fish communities during this <br />investigation. We used the Jensen, Utah gauge to characterize Whirlpool Canyon and Island- <br />Rainbow Park flows because the few small tributaries present between Whirlpool Canyon and <br />the downstream gauge will not affect flow estimates appreciably. <br />Fish sample data analysis and presentation.-Composition of the fish community in the <br />study area (Fig. 1) was calculated for samples collected in the 2002 to 2004 period for each gear <br />type. Longitudinal and temporal shifts in community composition were characterized by <br />partitioning samples into reaches both for small-bodied fishes captured primarily by seining and <br />for large-bodied fishes captured primarily by electrofishing in the periods 1994 to 1996 and 2002 <br />to 2004. Samples were from eight contiguous Green River reaches: a Browns Park reach, four 8- <br />RK Lodore Canyon reaches, upper and lower Whirlpool Canyon reaches (9 and 8 RK) and the <br />Island-Rainbow Park reach (10 RK); electrofishing samples were collected only in Lodore and <br />Whirlpool canyons. <br />Change in numerically dominant native and non-native fishes in reaches was compared <br />among study periods 1994 to 1996 and 2002 to 2004 and reaches to facilitate detection of <br />longitudinal shifts in community composition. We defined relative abundance as the percent <br />composition that a particular species represented in a sample. For seine samples, catch-per-unit- <br />effort (CPUE) was number of fish of a particular species divided by area sampled per seine haul <br />(density). For electrofishing samples, CPUE was number of fish captured per amount of time <br />sampled. For trammel net samples, CPUE was fish captured per net hr. We did not measure <br />11