Laserfiche WebLink
I. INTRODUCTION <br />COLORADO ISA GROWING, DYNAMICSTATE. Colorado's strong economy, excellent business <br />opportunities, and natural environment attract new residents and development activities in <br />large numbers every year. Between 1990 and 1997, the state grew by 18.2 percent, from <br />3.29 million to 3.93 million residents. Such growth established Colorado as the fifth fastest <br />growing state in the nation this decade. Moreover, this trend shows no immediate signs of <br />significantly slowing. The Colorado State Demographers Office projects that, by the year <br />2010, 4.89 million people will call Colorado home. This represents an increase of almost a <br />million new residents over the state's 1997 population. <br />GROWTH STRAINS NATIVESPECIEs. Growth is placing new stresses on some of the natural <br />features that help to make Colorado so attractive. Many native plant and animal species are <br />particularly sensitive to the effects of growth. As the state's land and water resources are <br />tapped to provide for the needs of Coloradans, plant and wildlife species and their habitats <br />are showing increasing signs of strain. Researchers at Colorado State University estimate <br />that, while populations of most Colorado wildlife species are relatively secure, 47 (6.4 <br />percent of the animals that occur in Colorado) are considered vulnerable. One hundred and <br />forty-one plant species (4.7 percent of the 3,000 plant species that occur in Colorado) are <br />also considered vulnerable. <br />THE FEDERAL ENDANGERED SPECIESACT IN COLORADO. Some of Colorado's native <br />species have declined to the point where they could become extinct. As a result, they have <br />been added to the list of federally protected threatened and endangered species pursuant to <br />the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). The ESA is frequently characterized as the <br />most powerful environmental protection law in the world due to the extensive regulatory <br />authority it confers upon the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service to alter or deny activities that <br />may negatively affect a "listed" species or its habitat. Use of this authority has generated <br />considerable controversy around the United States, due to concerns that federal-level <br />decisions would take private property without just compensation or unacceptably limit state <br />and local land use and natural resource management rights and prerogatives. <br />To ensure that such controversies are kept to a minimum in Colorado, Governor Roy <br />Romer initiated a Memorandum of Agreement Concerning Management of Colorado's <br />Declining Native Species (MOA) in 1995 with Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt, attached as <br />Appendix C. This MOA commits federal and state agencies to collaborate with local <br />governments, private citizens, businesses, and community groups to protect wildlife and <br />plant species before ESA listing may be required. The MOA also creates a policy <br />framework to address listed species. This policy framework places a premium on <br />collaboration, voluntary action, and constructive partnerships to address the conservation <br />needs of listed species in a manner that minimizes or in some cases eliminates the need to <br />invoke the ESA's substantial regulatory authorities. The MOA emphasizes the use of <br />market-based and other incentive approaches designed to respect private property interests. <br />The intent and promise behind this framework is to avoid the controversy, conflict, and <br />often expensive and time-consuming litigation that have attended ESA-related issues in <br />Native Species Conservation Trust Fund Page 3 <br />Annual Report to the Colorado General Assembly <br />Colorado Department of Natural Resources