Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 6. Percentage of copper, iron, manganese, molybdenum, and zinc loads in the dissolved phase entering and leaving <br />Dillon Reservoir, water year 1997 <br /> <br />[All values in percent; Dissolved molybdenum concentrations in some cases were greater than the total molybdenum concentrations. In this case. the <br />dissolved percentage was listed as 100 percent. All concentrations were deemed accurate within laboratory method precision] <br /> <br />Element Tenmile Creek Blue River Snake River Total incoming Blue River outgoing <br />Copper 62 60 24 32 88 <br />Iron 2.9 1.8 1.7 2.2 14.4 <br />Manganese 58 28 68 62 55 <br />Molybdenum 100 48 50 100 100 <br />Zinc 56 76 76 73 81 <br /> <br />larger grain-size materials settle out quickly as streams <br />enter the reservoir; as a result, all of these samples <br />were predominantly silt and clay. Samples from the <br />three upper arm sites ranged from 77 to 92 percent <br />silt and clay; lower arm sites ranged from 93 to <br />97 percent; and the main lake site was 98 percent silt <br />and clay. Although the wet sieving and the sorting in <br />the reservoir help to minimize the effects of grain size <br />on trace-element concentrations, concentrations were <br />normalized against the percent content of clay-sized <br />particles prior to comparisons among sites to further <br />reduce possible variability caused by differences in <br />particle-size distributions. <br />Clay-normalized concentrations of trace <br />elements in streambed sediments and surficial reser- <br />voir sediments are shown in figure 6. Differences <br />between each stream and arm of the reservoir and <br />longitudinal differences in the downstream direction <br />are evident on these plots. The heavy metal concentra- <br />tions that were higher in the Snake River streambed- <br />sediment sample (barium, copper, lead, nickel, and <br />zinc) also were higher in sediment samples from <br />the Snake River arm of Dillon Reservoir than in sedi- <br />ment samples from the other arms. In most cases, <br />concentrations in the Blue River and Tenmile Creek <br />were less than those from the Snake River streambed <br />sediment. <br />Among the seven elements shown in figure 6, <br />a common longitudinal pattern is found. Concentra- <br />tions of barium, cadmium, copper, iron, lead, nickel, <br />and zinc display a longitudinal decrease in normalized <br />concentration. The largest decrease in clay-normalized <br />concentration occurs between the streambed sediment <br />and the upper arm of the reservoir. Little change in <br /> <br />sediment-core concentration is seen from the upper <br />arm to the dam for the arm with the lowest concentra- <br />tion, typically the Blue River or Tenmile Creek. <br />If there were no additional sources of sediment <br />between the streambed-sampling sites and near the <br />dam in the lower part of the reservoir, and if there were <br />no geochemical alterations of the sediment chemistry <br />within the reservoir, normalized concentrations near <br />the dam would be expected to be the mass-weighted <br />average of concentrations in sediments from the arms. <br />In this situation, the normalized concentration near the <br />dam would be expected to be between those levels <br />observed in the arms. The elements in figure 6 exhibit <br />slightly lower concentrations at the site near the dam <br />than would be expected if the above scenario were the <br />only influence on the sedimentation of trace elements. <br />The decrease in many of the metals in the downstream <br />direction suggests the influence of dilution of the <br />stream sediments by sediment with trace-element <br />concentrations similar to or lower than that of the Blue <br />River, the stream with typically the lowest trace- <br />element sediment concentrations. One logical source <br />of sediment that would act to dilute concentrations of <br />some metals is erosion of bank material in the reser- <br />voir. When a reservoir is built, a new shoreline is <br />formed. It can take years or even decades for this <br />new shoreline to stabilize, and erosion can be a major <br />source of sediment to the reservoir. The shoreline <br />has yet to stabilize around parts of Dillon Reservoir <br />(fig. 7) and, because sedimentation rates in the reser- <br />voir are relatively low (about 0.5 cm/yr at site DLN), <br />bank erosion could be an important contributor of <br />sediment. <br /> <br />18 Identification of Water-Quality Trends Using Sediment Cores from Dillon Reservoir, Summit County, Colorado <br />