My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9320
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9320
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:54:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9320
Author
Hill, R.
Title
White River Survey.
USFW Year
1963.
USFW - Doc Type
Project number F-26-R-1,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
26 <br />of those surveyed, the relationship of surface area, depth, volume and <br />velocity to reduced discharge is indicated diagrammatically in Figure 12. _ <br />It is evident from the conclusions above that considerable <br />reduction in discharge can occur without greatly changing the surface ~ . <br />area or appearance of the stream. However, the basic but less obvious <br />fish habitat factors of depth and velocity are more directly proportion- <br />al to discharge, and they may be so reduced as to critically affect <br />trout stream production without appreciable change in surface area or <br />appearance. <br />-The stream surface area was mapped by habitat types and plan- <br />imetered for each station from one to four times as the discharge changed <br />normally or by controlled diversion. The tables of habitat type areas <br />are included in the Appendix D. With reduction of discharge there is <br />a general tendency (a) for pool area to be reduced because of lesser ~~ <br />depths; (b) for deep fast to become riffle as depth and velocity are . <br />lowered; (c) for riffle to become slow shallow; and (d) for slow <br />shallow to become dry rock (Figure 13). The net effect of these changes <br />depends upon the characteristics of individual streambed sections and <br />the extent of discharge reduction. <br />The reduction of fish habitat on the Sweetwater was best illus- <br />trated at Station I with discharges of 42, 22, 16 and 7 c.f.s. (Figure <br />14 and 15). The amount of fish habitat on the South Fork, Station VIII, <br />at flows of 59, 22, 14, and 8 c.f.s. is presented (Figure 16 and 17). <br />Detailed tables (Appendix D) and charts (Appendix E) were _ <br />prepared to show the effect of discharge reductions on fish habitat types. <br />Erosion.--The watershed of both Sweetwater Creek and South <br />Fork consist generally of a volcanic cap at the upper elevations, and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.