Laserfiche WebLink
~s . <br />lyg <br />9 <br /> <br /> <br />eR)'r: ~. <br />~=~~~~r1r1SGn + ~i rune. C ~ ~ ~~~~ <br />l~ ~:. <br />~ol ~-°' <br />THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT <br />AND SOUTHWEST FISHES 7l3S <br />James E. Johnson and John N. Rinne <br />he native fish fauna of the American Southwest' is char- <br />Tacterized by endemism and unique adaptations to some of <br />the harshest aquatic environments in the world (USDI 1978; <br />Naiman and Soltz 1981). From the large pike-like Colorado <br />squawfish (Ptychocheilus Lucius) and bizarre humpback chub <br />(Gila cypha) to the minuscule Comanche Springs pupfish <br />(Cyprinodon efegans) and the colorful Arizona trout (Salmo <br />apache), native fishes of this region display a remarkable assem- <br />blage of physiological, morphological, and behavioral traits (see <br />covers for photos). But despite these unique adaptations, and <br />perhaps even more noteworthy, most of the native Southwest- <br />ern fishes are now facing the real and imminent threat of extinc- <br />tion. <br />More than three decades ago Miller (1946) made a plea to <br />study fishes in Western rivers, and later (Miller 1961) docu- <br />mented their decline. As he projected, native Southwestem fishes <br />are disappearing. Twenty-seven of the 44 (61%) U.S. fish spe- <br />ties listed under the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 <br />are endemic to the Southwest. Deacon et al. (1979) listed 251 <br />taxa of fishes in North America as likely candidates for federal <br />listing under the 1973 Act; 199 of those are native to the United <br />States and 94 (47%) are native to the Southwest. These figures <br />become even more significant when one considers the lack of <br />diversity of the Southwestem fish fauna. Twenty-two of the 27 <br />(81%) native Arizona fish species are listed by state or federal <br />agencies as nearing extinction, and 31 of 73 (42%) native New <br />Mexico species are similarly designated. In addition, 19% of <br />Arizona's native fish species have been extirpated and 16% of <br />New Mexico's fishes have succumbed to the same fate. Pfister <br />(1981) noted that 20 taxa of fish are native to the desert regions <br />'This paper uses the approximate U.S. boundaries of Brown and Lowe <br />(1980) to define the American Southwest, and includes Arizona. New <br />Mexico, west Texas. and southern portions of California. Nevada. Utah, <br />and Colorado. <br />of California; seven of those are extinct and six others are endan- <br />gered. These losses demonstrate a continuing and progressive <br />depletion of the native fishes of this region and s}rggest the entire <br />assemblage of Southwestem fishes could be considered an <br />endangered faunal group. <br />The present dilemma of Southwestem fishes results principally <br />from the ubiquitous loss of aquatic habitats. This in turn has led <br />to reductions in .geographic ranges and local extirpations of <br />species, and is directly attributable to the ever-increasing activi- <br />ties of man (Miller 1961). Purposeful changes in the major rivers <br />,r.r.: , .;¢a . ~~h ^1g~ ..f.t,,,1?Fc!a, ~Ytio^ Act <br />,,....:5 Te j:~^ .. u c p:..... a w.. y gc ~ _ _ _ _ <br />of 1902 and began in 1911 with completion of the Roosevelt <br />Dam on the Salt River in central Arizona. Control of the mighty <br />Colorado River began with closare of Boulder Dam in 1932; <br />today, the Colorado River is perhaps the mast regulated river in <br />the world, its total flow now being spread over the deserts of the <br />Southwest The natural annual cycle of flooding and drought <br />are now totally buffered, and the present flows are dictated by, <br />and obligated to, power and irrigational demands. High dams <br />THE AUTHORS: James E. Johnson began working . a <br />^:'~~th desert fishes in 1965. He obtained his Ph.D. from <br />`~ Arizona State University in 1969. He taught ichthyology <br />at Arizona State University in ~~1970, taught fisheries at the <br />'. University of Massachusefts from 1970 to 1974,'was a ' <br />fisheries biologist for the Bureaii`of.Land Management in <br />~' Colorado in 1975, end since 1976 has worked in the <br />Office of Endangered Species, U.S: Fish and Wildlife Ser- <br />~~~: vice, in Albuquerque.; A merr-ber of AFS since 1966, he <br />"~, is a certified Fisheries Saentist, past president of the Ari- <br />zona-New Mexico Chapter and member of the'AFS and =~ <br />Western Division AFS Endangered Species Committees. <br />;~ Hgis presently chairman of the Desert Fishes Coundl. Hts <br />address at USFWS, Office of Endangered Speaes, is P.O. <br />'' $oz 1306, Albuquerque, N.M 87103. John N. Rinne <br />3 obtatned both his M.S. (1969) and Ph.D.,(1973) from the - <br />~~ pepan7rrerit, of Zoology at Arizona State.University. He <br />has been working with the U.S: Forest Service Range and -- <br />-. _ _ <br />`:~ Forest Experiment Station in Tempe, Arizona; since 1976, <br />.. where he. is.currently conducting research on habrtats, , <br />;: <br />-- biology, and distribution ~of desert fishes: He has been a , <br />member of AFS since 1969 and past president of the <br />`Arizona-New Mexico Chapter. He is current chairman of <br />;; _the Western Division's Endangered Spades Committee. , <br />His address with the Forest Service is Rocky Mountain <br />Forest Range and Experiment Station, Forest Hydrology <br />Lab, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281. <br />Fisheries, Vol. 7, No. 3 <br />John N. Rinne <br />James E. Johnson <br />