~s .
<br />lyg
<br />9
<br />
<br />
<br />eR)'r: ~.
<br />~=~~~~r1r1SGn + ~i rune. C ~ ~ ~~~~
<br />l~ ~:.
<br />~ol ~-°'
<br />THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
<br />AND SOUTHWEST FISHES 7l3S
<br />James E. Johnson and John N. Rinne
<br />he native fish fauna of the American Southwest' is char-
<br />Tacterized by endemism and unique adaptations to some of
<br />the harshest aquatic environments in the world (USDI 1978;
<br />Naiman and Soltz 1981). From the large pike-like Colorado
<br />squawfish (Ptychocheilus Lucius) and bizarre humpback chub
<br />(Gila cypha) to the minuscule Comanche Springs pupfish
<br />(Cyprinodon efegans) and the colorful Arizona trout (Salmo
<br />apache), native fishes of this region display a remarkable assem-
<br />blage of physiological, morphological, and behavioral traits (see
<br />covers for photos). But despite these unique adaptations, and
<br />perhaps even more noteworthy, most of the native Southwest-
<br />ern fishes are now facing the real and imminent threat of extinc-
<br />tion.
<br />More than three decades ago Miller (1946) made a plea to
<br />study fishes in Western rivers, and later (Miller 1961) docu-
<br />mented their decline. As he projected, native Southwestem fishes
<br />are disappearing. Twenty-seven of the 44 (61%) U.S. fish spe-
<br />ties listed under the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973
<br />are endemic to the Southwest. Deacon et al. (1979) listed 251
<br />taxa of fishes in North America as likely candidates for federal
<br />listing under the 1973 Act; 199 of those are native to the United
<br />States and 94 (47%) are native to the Southwest. These figures
<br />become even more significant when one considers the lack of
<br />diversity of the Southwestem fish fauna. Twenty-two of the 27
<br />(81%) native Arizona fish species are listed by state or federal
<br />agencies as nearing extinction, and 31 of 73 (42%) native New
<br />Mexico species are similarly designated. In addition, 19% of
<br />Arizona's native fish species have been extirpated and 16% of
<br />New Mexico's fishes have succumbed to the same fate. Pfister
<br />(1981) noted that 20 taxa of fish are native to the desert regions
<br />'This paper uses the approximate U.S. boundaries of Brown and Lowe
<br />(1980) to define the American Southwest, and includes Arizona. New
<br />Mexico, west Texas. and southern portions of California. Nevada. Utah,
<br />and Colorado.
<br />of California; seven of those are extinct and six others are endan-
<br />gered. These losses demonstrate a continuing and progressive
<br />depletion of the native fishes of this region and s}rggest the entire
<br />assemblage of Southwestem fishes could be considered an
<br />endangered faunal group.
<br />The present dilemma of Southwestem fishes results principally
<br />from the ubiquitous loss of aquatic habitats. This in turn has led
<br />to reductions in .geographic ranges and local extirpations of
<br />species, and is directly attributable to the ever-increasing activi-
<br />ties of man (Miller 1961). Purposeful changes in the major rivers
<br />,r.r.: , .;¢a . ~~h ^1g~ ..f.t,,,1?Fc!a, ~Ytio^ Act
<br />,,....:5 Te j:~^ .. u c p:..... a w.. y gc ~ _ _ _ _
<br />of 1902 and began in 1911 with completion of the Roosevelt
<br />Dam on the Salt River in central Arizona. Control of the mighty
<br />Colorado River began with closare of Boulder Dam in 1932;
<br />today, the Colorado River is perhaps the mast regulated river in
<br />the world, its total flow now being spread over the deserts of the
<br />Southwest The natural annual cycle of flooding and drought
<br />are now totally buffered, and the present flows are dictated by,
<br />and obligated to, power and irrigational demands. High dams
<br />THE AUTHORS: James E. Johnson began working . a
<br />^:'~~th desert fishes in 1965. He obtained his Ph.D. from
<br />`~ Arizona State University in 1969. He taught ichthyology
<br />at Arizona State University in ~~1970, taught fisheries at the
<br />'. University of Massachusefts from 1970 to 1974,'was a '
<br />fisheries biologist for the Bureaii`of.Land Management in
<br />~' Colorado in 1975, end since 1976 has worked in the
<br />Office of Endangered Species, U.S: Fish and Wildlife Ser-
<br />~~~: vice, in Albuquerque.; A merr-ber of AFS since 1966, he
<br />"~, is a certified Fisheries Saentist, past president of the Ari-
<br />zona-New Mexico Chapter and member of the'AFS and =~
<br />Western Division AFS Endangered Species Committees.
<br />;~ Hgis presently chairman of the Desert Fishes Coundl. Hts
<br />address at USFWS, Office of Endangered Speaes, is P.O.
<br />'' $oz 1306, Albuquerque, N.M 87103. John N. Rinne
<br />3 obtatned both his M.S. (1969) and Ph.D.,(1973) from the -
<br />~~ pepan7rrerit, of Zoology at Arizona State.University. He
<br />has been working with the U.S: Forest Service Range and --
<br />-. _ _
<br />`:~ Forest Experiment Station in Tempe, Arizona; since 1976,
<br />.. where he. is.currently conducting research on habrtats, ,
<br />;:
<br />-- biology, and distribution ~of desert fishes: He has been a ,
<br />member of AFS since 1969 and past president of the
<br />`Arizona-New Mexico Chapter. He is current chairman of
<br />;; _the Western Division's Endangered Spades Committee. ,
<br />His address with the Forest Service is Rocky Mountain
<br />Forest Range and Experiment Station, Forest Hydrology
<br />Lab, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281.
<br />Fisheries, Vol. 7, No. 3
<br />John N. Rinne
<br />James E. Johnson
<br />
|