Laserfiche WebLink
$15.78 million, $7.01 million, and $11.39 million, respectively. The range of the annualized <br />values for output is from $4.72 million (Scenario A2) to $0.79 million (Scenario B2). If the <br />direct impacts to the recreation sector within the Colorado River Basin region are offset by <br />substitution to other recreational activities outside the region, then the upper bound scenario <br />of national economic impacts for the with fish scenario still would be positive. <br />Table I-7-5. National Efficiency (CGE): Present and Annualized Values <br /> Annualized Value Present Value <br /> (1982 $ millions) (1982 $ millions) <br /> 0% 3°!0 5% 10% 0 0.03 0.05 0.1 <br />Scenario A2 Rea! Gross Regional Product 5.12 4.72 4.45 3.89 158.71 94.30 69.52 36.74 <br />Earnings 5.04 4.64 4.38 3.84 156.35 92.90 68.48 36.19 <br />Gov't Rev. 1.96 1.81 1.70 1.49 60.77 36.11 26.62 14.07 <br />Scenario B2 Real Gross Regional Product 0.86 0.79 0.74 0.65 26.SS 15.78 11.63 6.15 <br />Earnings 0.38 0.35 0.33 0.29 11.8 7.01 5.12 2.73 <br />Gov't Rev. 0.62 0.57 0.54 0.47 19.18 11.39 8.40 4.44 <br />Conclusion <br />The regional impacts depicted in I-6-7 provide three conclusions. First, for the Colorado <br />River Basin as a whole, regional economic impacts are clearly positive. Second, the <br />State-level impacts are not distributed evenly over the individual States in the Basin. Finally, <br />the percent deviation from the without fish scenario is small. <br />The national efficiency output impacts reported in Tables I-7-4 and I-7-5 range from -$3.34 <br />million (Scenario B1) to $4.72 million (Scenario A2). Based upon the characteristics of the <br />Basin and the nature of the regional economies, the annualized value of $3.77 million <br />reported for Scenario Al is the most plausible. <br />I-47 <br />