My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8169a
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8169a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:48:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8169a
Author
Brookshire, D. S., M. McKee and G. Watts.
Title
Draft Economic Analysis of Proposed Critical Habitat Designation in the Colorado River Basin for the Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squawfish, and Bonytail.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
between the region and the remainder of the economy.13 Decisions, however, concerning the <br />extent to which the resource changes represent national impacts or the extent to which they <br />are pure transfers from elsewhere in the economy still must be made. In what follows, four <br />alternative scenarios are analyzed. These scenarios represent bounds on the results where it is <br />either assumed there is or is not excess construction capacity and whether or not substitute <br />recreation sites exist outside the region. <br />1. Scenario Al and B1-Constniction-Related Impacts <br />The distinction between region-level impacts and national efficiency effects is due to the fact <br />that some region-level impacts are canceled out at the national level through transfers of <br />resources from other parts of the economy. The extent to which the impacts are pure <br />transfers depends on the extent to which capacity remains unused in the relevant economic <br />sectors elsewhere in the economy. The thermal generation capacity expansion, projected to <br />be required to offset losses in hydroelectric generation, involves the construction sector and <br />the combined manufacturing (capital equipment) sector. These are sectors which are sensitive <br />to the overall state of the economy. During economic slowdown periods there is typically <br />considerable excess capacity in these sectors and the expansion within the Colorado Basin <br />Region will draw these idle resources from the national economy. In this case, the net <br />national direct impacts in these sectors will be the same as the regional impacts. This <br />constitutes Scenario Al in the following discussion. Alternatively, if the economy is near or <br />at full employment, the expansion in thermal capacity will simply shift already employed <br />resources from elsewhere in the economy and the net national impacts will be zero. This is <br />the case depicted in Scenario B 1 below. <br />Table I-7-2 reports the impacts associated with the proposed critical habitat designation in <br />terms of percentage deviation from the without fish scenario. Under Scenario Al there is an <br />expansion in the national economy and this expansion is reported in Table I-7-2 relative to <br />the level of economic activity in the Colorado River Basin region. Thus, the expansion <br />13 A presentation of consumer surplus and producer measures can be found in Volume II, Chapter II-15. <br />I-42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.