My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8169a
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8169a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:48:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8169a
Author
Brookshire, D. S., M. McKee and G. Watts.
Title
Draft Economic Analysis of Proposed Critical Habitat Designation in the Colorado River Basin for the Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squawfish, and Bonytail.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 7: Determination of the National Economic Efficiency Impacts <br />of Proposed Critical Habitat <br />b <br />A. Direct Economic Impacts as National Efficiency Effects <br />Evaluating the national economic impacts of the changes in resource allocations for <br />recovering the endangered fishes requires comparing the levels of economic activity before <br />and after this reallocation of resources. An implicit assumption underlying such comparisons <br />is that the resource use in the without fish scenario is the highest valued use. Further, it is <br />assumed that the economy returns to a new equilibrium after the initial direct impacts have <br />worked through the economy. Thus, the projected allocation of resources for the with fish <br />scenario is the new highest valued use. These assumptions allow the comparison of the total <br />value of the output of the economy before impacts to the total value of the output after <br />impacts. The difference is the measure of the national economic impacts. The appropriate <br />measure of the cost of resources is their opportunity cost. This is the value of what these <br />resources aze capable of producing in their next best use. These costs or benefits are <br />sometimes referred to as efficiency costs or benefits. Specifically, national efficiency <br />measures are computed as changes in the consumer and producer surplus. These measures <br />capture the net gains and losses resulting from the resource reallocation. <br />Typically, economists have not been able to measure the generalized changes in consumer and <br />producer surplus, and, thus, approximate approaches have been developed. A value is placed <br />on the output change by utilizing existing prices. This assumes that the value of the direct <br />output given up in designating critical habitat is equal to the cost of the resources necessary <br />to undertake the new activities represented by the reallocation. This procedure yields national <br />efficiency impacts. <br />Computing national efficiency impacts in this fashion is an acceptable approximation if <br />several assumptions aze satisfied. First, to use prices to value the resources displaced by the <br />impact requires that the market for the good in question be free of distortions so that the <br />I-39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.