My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8169a
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8169a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:48:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8169a
Author
Brookshire, D. S., M. McKee and G. Watts.
Title
Draft Economic Analysis of Proposed Critical Habitat Designation in the Colorado River Basin for the Razorback Sucker, Humpback Chub, Colorado Squawfish, and Bonytail.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Table I-6-6. State Employment -Incremental Impacts Over Time of Critical Habitat Designation <br /> (Jobs) <br /> 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 <br />Arizona -0.91 -2.065 -3.69 -6.90 -12.97 -19.65 <br />California 21.20 28.060 274.00 504.41 828.15 1231.78 <br />Colorado 11.32 9.240 -2.17 -14.76 -30.83 -47.95 <br />Nevada 0.00 -1.067 -3.68 -7.62 -12.90 -19.49 <br />New Mexico -1.78 -7.840 -23.94 -47.36 -82.62 -126.34 <br />Utah -22.27 -42.390 -60.09 -72.56 -84.60 -95.58 <br />Wyoming 0.00 -0.770 -1.50 -2.27 -2,91 -3.55 <br />Colorado <br />River Basin 28.88 84.700 204.21 364.21 586.82 877.69 <br />5. Present Value and Annualized Incremental Impacts <br />Table I-6-7 presents three ways of representing the impacts associated with- the designation of <br />critical habitat for the aggregate measures of economic activity. The values presented in <br />Table I-6-7 were previously presented in Tables I-6-3, I-6-4, and I-6-5 and are included here <br />for comparison purposes. In addition, Table I-6-7 reports the annualized values and the <br />present value of the impacts as a percent of the present value using the without fish scenario <br />projections." This provides a relative compazison of the size of the incremental critical <br />habitat impacts between the without fish and with fish scenarios. <br />An examination of the percentage deviations reported in Table 1-6-7 illustrates that <br />incremental critical habitat impacts represent a small deviation from the level of economic <br />activity projected in the without fish scenario. For example, for the Basin as a whole, the <br />deviation in total output is 0.0006 percent (6 ten thousandths of a percent). <br /> <br />"The annualized value transforms a fluctuating impact stream into a levelized equivalent present value. <br />I-37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.