Laserfiche WebLink
Finally, the entries inside the table illustrate the third conclusion. The impacts of the <br />proposed critical habitat designation aze not distributed evenly over the economic sectors that <br />make up the State and the Basin economy. For example, the impacts in the other crops sector <br />range from a positive $147 million in California to a negative $6.93 million in Colorado. The <br />overall impact for the Basin for the other crops sector is $128.23 million. Livestock feed has <br />impacts that range from a positive impact of $28.10 million in California to a negative $39.56 <br />million in New Mexico. And the overall Basin impact for this sector is a negative $52.27 <br />million. <br />Similazly, in the recreation services sector the total impacts range from a positive $3.20 <br />million in California to a negative $20.01 million in Colorado. The overall impacts across the <br />Basin aze a negative $16.79 million in the recreation services sector. Finally, the electric <br />power production sector impacts aze a positive $2.0 million in California and a negative <br />$21.07 million in Colorado. <br />I-32 <br />