My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8141B
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8141B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:48:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8141B
Author
Wydoski, R. S. and W. T. Helm.
Title
Effects of Alterations to Low Gradient Reaches of Utah Streams
USFW Year
1980.
USFW - Doc Type
Summary.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />According to local landowners, channellzatlon of the streambeds in the <br />Blacksmith Fork and Logan Rivers began over 50 years ago when the ranchers <br />shovelled the streambed gravel by hand and transported this gravel from the <br />stream by horse-drawn wagons. Short reaches of the rivers have been altered <br />ever since that time. Today short reaches of the rivers are altered period- <br />ically with backhoes and bulldozers by individual ranchers because of flooding <br />in agricultural areas, and for flood control by the U. S. Army Corps of Engi- <br />neers. Five study sites were selected that would provide information on three <br />types of stream channel alterations (dredged, recently bulldozed, and old bull- <br />dozed) and two control areas in the floodplains of these rivers (Figure 1). <br /> <br />Erosion and deposition of streambed materials were directly correlated <br />with the length of stream that was altered and the type of alteration. In <br />addition, alterations that are made upstream can have a significant effect on <br />scouring and filling in downstream reaches. The energy to move streambed <br />materials depends upon the discharge at peak runoff; during extreme runoff, <br />more and larger bedstream materials are rearranged as the water rises and then <br />subsides. The amount of streambed materials that are rearranged even under the <br />mild runoff that occurred in 1975-76 can be quite large, especially in newly <br />altered reaches (Figure 2). The shape and integrity of the streambanks differed <br />distinctly between dredging and bulldozing alterations. For example, alter- <br />ations from bulldozing resulted in a uniform cross-section of the stream that <br />made the stream wider and shallower, and the riparian vegetation along the <br />streambanks was eliminated either by direct removal or by being covered with <br />streambed material. In contrast, the banks were usually only altered on one <br />side of the stream by dredging with a backhoe. In addition, the stream meander <br />was not changed significantly by dredging while the stream was realigned into <br />a straight reach by bulldozing. Fewer pools remained in reaches that were <br />altered by bulldozer than in reaches that were altered by dredging. Generally, <br />the gradient of the stream was made more uniform by bulldozing than by <br />dredging and these changes persisted longer. High spring streamflows appeared <br />to be required to restore the frequency and depth of pools in altered reaches. <br />However, the degree of the alteration was also important. For example, alter- <br />ations in the pool-riffle ratios and gradient by dredging generally reverted <br />to the original character after spring runoff even during the gradual runoff <br />that occurred during 1975-76. Most alterations to short reaches of stream <br />channels in these two Intermountain streams were relatively short-lived. . <br />However, numerous alterations made fairly frequently have resulted in unstable .~ <br />streambeds and, consequently, are having a significant, detrimental impact on ] <br />the trout populations in these streams. <br /> <br />Because the various life stages of fish require different habitat condi- <br />tions, the population densities varied widely from season to season even within <br />a study site. In addition, age and size of the fish influence the behavior to <br />select certain environmental conditions. For these reasons, direct comparisons <br />of population densities is difficult. The overall changes in the population of <br />brown trout (1973 year class) in the study sites is summarized in Figure 3. <br />Alteration of the stream channel, even short reaches, by dredging and bull- <br />dozing adversely affected the trout populations in these reaches. Much varia- <br />tion occurred in the mountain whitefish populations at all sites (Figure 4 and <br />5). However, the whitefish populations were most stable throughout the year in <br /> <br />~ <br />L <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.