Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />. Erosion and deposition of streambed gravel were directly correlated with <br />the percentage of stream reach that was altered. The greatest erosion and <br />deposition resulted in reaches with a high proportion of alteration whereas <br />reaches with a lower proportion of alteration were less affected. Pools <br />occurred less frequently in bulldozed than in backhoe altered areas, although <br />this may have been due to stream characteristics rather than the type of <br />alteration. Shape and integrity of stream banks differed distinctly between the <br />two types of alteration. Banks were left relatively unchanged in shape during <br />dredging, except that in some places they were nearly covered with material <br />removed from the streambed. Some of the riparian vegetation survived. Stream <br />banks and riparian vegetation in bulldozed areas were eliminated, as banks <br />were either tapered back or completely covered, with no deep water left in <br />close proximity. <br /> <br />High stream flows in spring appeared to be required to maintain the depth <br />and frequency of pools. Normal spring flows through altered reaches removed <br />streambed materials deposited in pools by the alteration process, restoring <br />them to near pre-alteration depths. Although the location of pools may have <br />been changed somewhat as a result of channelization and subsequent restoration <br />by fluvial processes, the number of pools was essentially the same. Low <br />spring flows did not restore many altered pools, and left some pools in <br />unaltered areas shallower than usual. While about equal amounts of erosion <br />occurred during the low flows of fall and the high flows of spring in altered <br />stream reaches, most deposition occurred during the high flows in spring. <br /> <br />In all bulldozed sites the trout populations were not self-sustaining, <br />either because of few spawning adults or little recruitment and survival of age <br />o trout. No long term differences in growth rates were observed for trout in <br />altered or unaltered reaches. <br /> <br />During the study, dredging had less affect than bulldozing on survival of <br />age 0 fish, but there were indications that dredging would reduce spawning in <br />the future. <br /> <br />During low streamflows brown trout and whitefish used deep pools. Since <br />such pools were absent from severely channeled areas fish moved from these <br />altered areas into areas which contained pools, but returned when streamflows <br />were normal. Although the biomass and production of brown trout were adver- <br />sely affected by stream channel alterations. these measurements failed to show <br />that trout from severely channeled areas depend on more natural reaches for <br />survival during low streamflows and for recruitment of young. <br /> <br />Production of brown trout and mountain whitefish was directly related to <br />the proportion of a reach in pools, being highest in the reach with the most <br />pools and least in the reachwiththe fewest. Biomass followed this same <br />trend. <br /> <br />Growth of whitefish was faster in both altered and unaltered areas of the <br />Blacksmith Fork and Logan Rivers than has been reported in the literature for <br /> <br />iv <br />