Laserfiche WebLink
<br />about 30 cm greater in June, 1976 than January, 1975, but was about the same in <br />June, 1975 and June, 1976. <br /> <br />Station 689 was changed more drastically than any other station (Figure 19). <br />The origin of the profile on the baseline was located on a gravel bar on the <br />convex or deposition side of a sharp bend. Each time the stream was altered, <br />this gravel bar was removed and the deep pool on the outside of the bend was <br />filled. Every year, the spring runoff replaced the bar where it would be <br />expected to occur naturally and re-excavated the deep pool. These changes <br />resulted in the deposition of much bedload from upstream and moved the bedload <br />from the pool area downstream. In addition, the streambank on the north end of <br />this transect needed to be continually stabilized by the landowner. Dredging <br />in August had changed the channel sufficiently to redirect the thalweg, which <br />resulted in rapid erosion ofonepbrtion of the bank and created the threat of <br />cutting off an entire meander. This area of bank cutting was filled in with <br />gravel retained by logs on Nay 1, 1976. After spring runoff in 1976, the <br />outline of the stream in this vicinity was similar to that of January, 1975, but <br />the thalweg location was shifted. Changes in this reach appeared to have a <br />large effect downstream in deposition of streambed material and the location of <br />deep pools. <br /> <br />Shifts in the location of the bank on the north end of this transect <br />resulted in a deposition of 1.8 m of fill during dredging in spring. 1975, <br />erosion of 8.5 m during spring runoff, deposition of 8.8 m during dredging in <br />August, and an erosion of 8.2 m between August, 1975 and April, 1976. The bank <br />was finally relocated about 6.4 m north of where it was located in January, <br />1975. The maximum depth remained the same in January and June, 1975, and June, <br />1976, in spite of all the changes that occurred during this time. <br /> <br />Station 724, about 30 m upstream from station 689, and located between two <br />bends in the river, exhibited some great changes during the study. The strea~ <br />width decreased by more than 50 percent as a result of dredging and sediment <br />deposition during spring runoff in 1975, and subsequently increased again to 82 <br />percent of the original width. This increase was not due to the direct effects <br />of the August dredging, but rather to subsequent shifting of the streambed. <br /> <br />The stream depth changed little; however, it increased about 46 cm with <br />the first dredging, became 15 cm deeper with the 1975 runoff, and was mostly <br />refilled during the 1976 runoff. The final depth was less than 30 cm deeper <br />than it was in January, 1975. With one exception, the deepest part of the <br />cross section was always on the left or eastern side of the stream. Formation <br />of large gravel bars during the 1975 runoff, their removal in August, and the <br />subsequent reappearance of small but apparently stable bars by June of 1976 <br />appear to be linked with changes in~ediately downstream. When the channel at <br />station 724 was narrow, severe erosion occurred'on the concave bank at station <br />689. A wide channel at 724 appeared to influence the location of the thalweg, <br />and reduce erosion at 689. <br /> <br />Cross sections were surveyed at the Blacksmith control site in November, <br />1975 and again in July 1976, following the spring runoff (Figure 20). No <br />alteration work was done during the period of study, and according to the land <br />owner it has been over 20 years since any was done. <br /> <br />35 <br />