Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Near the upstream end of the horseshoe bend, slightly more than 60 m up- <br />stream from station 434, station 502 exhibited a slightly different set of <br />conditions (Figure 18). A large gravel bar on the convex, inner side of the <br />bend was removed in f'1arch, 1975, restored by high flows in May, and again <br />removed in August. Width of the water surface was increased from 6 m in January, <br />1975 to 10 m in August. There was little change in profile until after the <br />spring runoff in 1976. The cross sectional profile in June, 1976 was very <br />similar to that of the previous June, with a water surface width of only 5.5 m, <br />0.6 m less than before the stream was altered. The cross sectional area had <br />increased by 33 percent from January, 1975 to April, 1976, but by June, 1976 it <br />was 28 percent less than in January, 1975. Maximum cross sectional depth was <br />about 0.4 m greater in June, 1976 than in January, 1975. <br /> <br />Station 545 was in the middle of a sharp bend about 30 m upstream from <br />station 502. As was typical for other locations, the gravel bar on the convex, <br />deposition side of the river was removed each time the stream was altered. <br />Stream width at the water line varied fro~ 7.6 m in January, 1975 to 13.4 m in <br />April after alteration, 7.9 m in June after spring high flow, 10.7 m in Septem- <br />ber after a second modification and 9.8 m in June, 1976 after high flow. In <br />each case the stream banks above waterlevel remained about the same. Differences <br />in width were caused by a gravel bar that was deposited along the inside of the <br />river bend. <br /> <br />The maximum depth of this cross section was increased about 30 cm by the <br />dredging in March, by an additional 5 cm during spring runoff, by 5 cm more by <br />dredging in August and by another 38 cm during the 1976 spring runoff. Part of <br />this 0.8 m increase in depth was due to normal deepening of the channel by the <br />spring runoff. During low flows, pools commonly decrease in depth because of <br />deposition of streambed materials. High spring flows remove this material again, <br />and deposit it along the convex sides of bends further downstream. The total <br />difference in depth between January, 1975 and June, 1976 is due to the combin- <br />ation of spring high flow and dredging. <br /> <br />Channel cross sectional areas changed from 3.25 m2 in January, 1975 to 7.5 <br />in April, 4.9 in June, 4.9 in September, 4.2 in January, 1976, 6.4 in April and <br />8.8 in June, 1976. Water surface elevations changed very little during this <br />time, despite the 79 percent increase in cross sectional area. <br /> <br />Station 662 was midway in a straight reach of the stream about 77 m <br />upstream from station 545. The main water current flowed close to the eastern <br />or left bank. Dredging reduced the stream width from 12 to 9 m in spring, <br />1975, and other alterations upstream changed the thalweg course sufficiently to <br />cause erosion along the east bank and a large deposition of sand and gravel on <br />the west or right bank during spring runoff. Dredging in late summer did not <br />change the width, but shifted the stream channel to the right. Low flows <br />between September and April eroded 1.8 m of the left bank and deposited 60 cm <br />of gravel along the right bank. The spring runoff had little effect on the <br />left bank but eroded 1.2 m of the right bank and removed about 30 cm of the <br />streambed from the right bank. These cl1anges resulted in a more uniform depth <br />across the stream at this station. The lack of deposition on the right side was <br />probably the result of restoring the channel cross section that would occur <br />normally and which redirected the current at station 622. The maximum depth was <br /> <br />32 <br />