Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Fall: <br />Winter: <br />Spring: <br />Summer: <br /> <br />October, November, December <br />January, February, March <br />April, May, June <br />July, August, September <br /> <br />Significance of differences between seasons and sites was determined by <br />analysis of variance and least significant difference. <br /> <br />RESULTS AND DISCUSSION <br /> <br />PHYSICAL PARAMETERS <br /> <br />Three type of illustrations are used to depict changes in the river over <br />time: (l) a series of plan view maps show how the river meander, water current, <br />and gravel bars shifted during the study; (2) cross sections at particular <br />locations depict changes in the stream bottom after varying lengths of time; <br />and (3) thalweg profiles record how the longitudinal profile changed over time. <br />The following discussion requires reference to plan view maps to establish the <br />location of cross sections and the meander of the river in the study area. <br />Distances along stream reaches are recorded in meters, and stations (cross <br />sections) are identified by their position (in meters) along the reach. <br /> <br />General Changes in ~tream Meander, Water Current and Gravel Bars <br /> <br />Stream length can be expressed by two measurements: (1) The centerline <br />length of the stream, and (2) the thalweg length that follows the deepest part <br />of the channel. A straight channel would produce a ratio of thalweg to center- <br />line length of one while a meandering channel would produce a ratio of more than <br />one. <br /> <br />Only one major change can be noted between November, 1972 and 1975 at <br />Logan bulldozed site (Figure 12). A pool with depths of greater than 1 m <br />developed between stations 46 and 137, and a large gravel bar was deposited on <br />the convex side of the river bend in the same area. Development of the pool <br />was accompanied by erosion of the bank 011 the concave side, a process which <br />prompted the landowner to use a bulldozer to remove the gravel bar to fill in <br />the pool and shift the western bank some 5.2 m further east. Between r1ay and <br />November, 1975, most of the 1975 alteration had been restored to pre-alteration <br />condition. This does not imply particularly good conditions, since only 8 <br />percent of the site length contained pools of 1 m depth or greater. <br /> <br />Examination of the plan view maps (Figure 13) discloses several changes <br />which took place at the Blacksmith dredged reach during this study. As mention- <br />ed in the discussion of cross sections, dredging usually removed streambed <br />materials along convex banks, and the river subsequently relocated the streambed <br />to the same general locations. Dredging usually widened the river, but deposi- <br />tion later usually returned the stream to near its original width. The numbers <br />and sizes of pools are of interest because of the importance to fish (Table 1). <br />Note that both the number of pools and total linear meters of pools more than <br />one m deep decreased after each dredging. Spring runoff in 1975 not only <br /> <br />21 <br />