My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8012
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:45:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8012
Author
Grand Canyon Trust.
Title
Colorado River Workshop, issues, ideas, and directions (February 26-28, 1996 Phoenix, Arizona) An open forum for discussion of management issues between managers, water users, and stakeholders of the Colorado River basin.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
1996.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Reservoir and river operations/senior <br />water rights <br />The Upper Basin Program cannot rely entirely on the <br />protection of existing, undeveloped flows for fish <br />recovery. The reoperation of existing federal water <br />projects under Section 7 of the ESA and the acquisition <br />of senior water rights and storage supplies for the fish- <br />es are also important program components. <br /> <br />. The 1992 biological opinion on the operation of <br />Flaming Gorge Reservoir is the most prominent example. <br />This opinion recommended dampening the unnaturally <br />high flow levels in nursery habitat downstream on the <br />Green River in the late summer and fall, and that a five <br />year research program be established to examine what <br />reservoir operations would best stabilize winter flows and <br />approximate more natural spring peaks. A similar <br />research program in preparation for the biological opinion <br />on the operation of the Aspinall Unit reservoirs on the <br />Gunnison River in Colorado is beginning its fourth year. <br /> <br />. Studies are nearing completion for saving and oper- <br />ationally sharing canal seepage and administrative <br />spills in Colorado's Grand Valley. The emerging strate- <br />gy is for the Upper Basin Program to fund capital <br />improvements that would allow the same deliveries to <br />the Grand Valley farms with lower river diversions. <br />This abatement in some of the most senior diversions <br />on the river would enable storage of water upstream at <br />Green Mountain Reservoir, which then could be <br />released to improve fish habitat and generate <br />hydropower along the way. <br /> <br />. Under the biological opinion for Ruedi Reservoir on <br />Colorado's Fryingpan River, the BOR is making deliv- <br />eries of about 20,000 acre feet per year out of this <br />reservoir to the fish habitat in the Grand Valley and has <br />entered both short and long term lease agreements <br /> <br />with the CWCB to legally protect the instream use of <br />those deliveries. The Colorado Division of Parks, the <br />CWCB and the FWS have just negotiated a similar lease <br />agreement to protect the instream use of up to 2,000 <br />acre feet of storage water per year released from <br />Steamboat Lake to fish habitat on the Yampa River. In <br />both cases, the storage water leased for the fishes had not <br />been contractually committed to other project purposes. <br /> <br />. A river operation and management plan is being <br />actively considered for the Yampa River in Colorado. <br />Under this plan, storage releases from the enlargement <br />of a fairly small, off mainstem reservoir could augment <br />both the CWCB's recent baseflow filing and new, junior <br />water development within the allowance left by the <br />CWCB's converse instream flow right. Another inter- <br />esting feature of this plan is that the Colorado River <br />Water Conservation District would voluntarily retire a <br />number of senior conditional water rights that it holds <br />in the Yampa River subbasin, which would materially <br />improve the relative priority and legal strength of the <br />CWCB's instream filings. <br /> <br />Restoration of floodplain habitat <br />In offering a broader perspective on quantifying the <br />flows needed for recovery, Stanford emphasized the <br />importance of re-connecting and restoring highly pro- <br />ductive side channel and floodplain habitat for the list- <br />ed fishes and recommended that a set of hypotheses <br />about the function of such habitat in a riverine ecosys- <br />tem be tested. This element of the Upper Basin <br />Program faced some difficult questions about how <br />much direct and continued manipulation of floodplain <br />habitat was needed, whether an objective should be to <br />construct and operate ponds to grow out and augment <br />fish populations, and whether the restoration of flood- <br />plain habitat without continued direct management <br />would benefit non-native fishes more than listed fishes. <br /> <br />53 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.