Laserfiche WebLink
STRATEGIES FOR RESTORING AND <br />PROTECTING INSTREAM FLOWS FOR <br />ENDANGERED FISH IN THE UPPER <br />COLORADO RIVER BASIN <br />John Hamill, Director <br />Upper Colorado River Recovery Program <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) <br />Box 25486, DFC <br />Denver, CO 80225 <br />(303) 236-2985 <br />ABSTRACT <br />Four native fish that inhabit the Colorado River have been <br />federally listed as endangered: the Colorado squawfuh, the <br />humpback chub, the bonytail chub, and the razorback sucker. <br />The Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fish <br />Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin (Recovery Program) <br />is a consortium of federal and state agencies, environmental <br />organizations, and private water-development interests whose <br />mission is to recover the endangered fish in the Upper Colorado <br />River Basin while allowing for new water development to <br />continue. A principal objective of the Recovery Program involves <br />acquiring and/or restoring adequate instream flows to support <br />self-sustaining populations of the endangered fish. Priority areas <br />for acquisition of water rights for the endangered fish in the <br />upper basin include the Yampa River, White River, and a 15- <br />mile reach of the Colorado River immediately upstream from the <br />confluence of the Gunnison River. The instream flow <br />requirements of the endangered fish have been identified for <br />several rivers; however, the scientific validity of the <br />recommendations has been questioned and independent review is <br />being conducted. The operation of several federal reservoirs <br />including Flaming Gorge, Blue Mesa, and Ruedi reservoirs has <br />been adjusted to meet the instream f low requirements of the fish. <br />Water and water rights are also being acquired and/or <br />appropriated to provide flows for the endangered fish in a <br />manner consistent with state water law and interstate compacts. <br />However, to date, progress in this area has been slow due to <br />several legal and institutional issues. Until these issues are <br />resolved, the recovery program is evaluating how Colorado's <br />water law might be used to protect flows on an interim or <br />conditional basis. <br />Introduction <br />An understanding of the strategies and problems associ- <br />ated with providing instream flows for the endangered <br />Colorado River fish requires an appreciation of the fish, <br />why they are endangered, and the importance of the <br />Colorado River as a source of water for municipal, indus- <br />trial, and agricultural purposes. The Colorado River yields <br />less water per square mile than any other major river in the <br />United States, yet provides 25 million people with water for <br />municipal, agricultural, industrial, and recreational pur- <br />poses. Water in the basin has been completely divided up <br />between the upper and lower basin states according to <br />interstate compacts made in 1922 and 1948. Dozens of <br />large dams have been constructed to harness the flows in <br />the basin and make those flows available for consumptive <br />(beneficial) use. The river has been altered to control its <br />water to the point that it has been described as the most <br />heavily used, controlled, and fought-over river in the <br />world. <br />Several unique, large river fish evolved in the turbulent, <br />sediment-laden rivers of the Colorado River Basin. Seventy- <br />four percent of the native fish fauna is endemic to the <br />Colorado River. Four of the endemic Colorado River fish-- <br />the Colorado squawfish, the humpback chub, the bonytail <br />chub, and the razorback sucker-are now threatened with <br />extinction due to low numbers and inadequate recruitment. <br />All four are listed as endangered under the Endangered <br />Species Act. Two others, the flannelmouth sucker and the <br />roundtail chub, are identified as candidate species for <br />listing under the Endangered Species Act. <br />These fish are endangered because they have been unable <br />to adjust to the changes in the environment brought about <br />by the activities of man. Changes in streamflow and water <br />temperature, direct loss of habitat due to inundation by <br />reservoirs, blockage of migration routes, and interaction <br />with introduced, non-native fish species (predation and <br />competition) are the primary factors responsible for the <br />decline of these native fish that once ranged throughout the <br />Colorado River Basin. <br />The plight of the native fish in the Colorado River Basin <br />is not an isolated problem. The extinction of three genera, <br />27 species and 13 subspecies have been documented in <br />North America during the past century (Miller et al. 1989). <br />According to the American Fisheries Society, more than <br />364 fish in Canada, the United States, and Mexico warrant <br />protection because of their rarity (Williams et al. 1989). <br />Future losses of fish species can only be expected to <br />increase unless the degradation of natural ecosystems is <br />abated. <br />Since 1978, the Fish and Wildlife Service has issued <br />more than 160 biological opinions pursuant to Section 7 of <br />the Endangered Species Act on the effects of water- <br />development projects on the Colorado River endangered <br />fish. These opinions all concluded that the cumulative <br />effects of water depletions from the Upper Colorado River <br />Basin are likely to jeopardize the survival of the endangered <br />fish. In 1984, the Service also produced a draft conserva- <br />47