Laserfiche WebLink
PROBLEMS IN QUANTIFYING FEDERAL <br />RESERVED RIGHTS FOR NATURAL AREAS <br />John R. Hill, Jr. <br />Water Resources and Environmental Consultant <br />P.O. Box 3822 <br />Englewood, CO 80155-3822 <br />(303) 740-2250 <br />ABSTRACT <br />For purposes of this paper, natural areas are defined as <br />federal reservations set aside for preservation in their natural <br />state, as opposed to multiple-use areas, and includes national <br />parks, some national monuments, wild and scenic rivers, and <br />some wilderness areas. The statutes creating such areas typically <br />require that the areas be kept "unimpaired" or in `free flowing <br />condition." While there are methodologies for quantifying flow <br />requirements for fish and channel maintenance, it is the author's <br />opinion that there are no methodologies legally or technically <br />adequate to quantify numerically the flow requirements to <br />maintain these natural systems in their natural or free flowing <br />condition. The problems arise from the fact that the state water- <br />administration systems, in which reserved rights are to be <br />integrated according to their priorities, anticipate and are <br />equipped to deal with annual amounts. Also, there are <br />compelling legal arguments that reservation of a national park, <br />wilderness area, or wild and scenic river in an unimpaired or <br />free flowing condition, reserves the flow regime existing at the <br />time of the reservation. These realities clash with the <br />expectations of Congress, the courts, the states and others that <br />federal reserved rights must be quantified numerically in the <br />"minimum" amounts necessary to fulfill the reservation purpose. <br />Introduction <br />In the first Western Regional Instream Flow Conference, <br />1 presented a paper entitled "Federal Reserved Rights." That <br />paper discussed the fundamentals of federal reserved rights <br />and briefly addressed how the federal reserved rights <br />doctrine might be applied to secure instream flows for <br />various federal reservations, including national forests, <br />national parks and monuments, wilderness areas and wild <br />and scenic rivers. The first paper introduced the problem of <br />quantification of instream reserved rights and suggested <br />that the problem has at least two facets-legal and techni- <br />cal. The legal facet involves the application of the rule of <br />"minimal necessity" applicable to quantification of reserved <br />rights to reservations, which are to be maintained in an <br />"unimpaired" or "free-flowing" condition. The technical <br />facet involves the problem with numerical quantification of <br />the flows required. This paper discusses both facets of the <br />problem and suggests a legally adequate and technically <br />workable approach to quantifying instream flows for <br />natural-area reservations. <br />Solely for purposes of this paper, natural areas are <br />arbitrarily defined as federal reservations set aside for <br />preservation in their natural state, including national parks, <br />some national monuments, wild and scenic rivers, and <br />some wilderness areas. Therefore, this paper does not <br />address multiple-use federal lands, such as national forests <br />and the public lands administered by the Bureau of Land <br />Management. Furthermore, in the interest of brevity and <br />simplicity, this paper will not discuss national monuments. <br />Before discussing the problem of quantification, a very <br />brief review of what a reserved right is, is necessary. Federal <br />reserved rights are created by implication when water is <br />necessary to fulfill the primary purposes of federal reserva- <br />tions or expressly by the legislation establishing the federal <br />reservation.' The priority date of a reserved right is the date <br />of the reservation, and only water that is unappropriated at <br />the time of the reservation can be reserved. The amount <br />reserved is only the amount necessary to fulfill the purpose <br />of the reservation. Reserved rights are based on federal <br />rather than state law.' However, once a reserved right is <br />adjudicated, it is subject to state administration. <br />PURPOSES OF NATURAL-AREA RESERVATIONS <br />National Parks <br />The fundamental or primary purpose of the national <br />parks is to conserve the scenery, the natural and historic <br />objects, and the wildlife therein, and to provide for the <br />enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means <br />as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future <br />generations.' <br />Because national parks are established by separate <br />statutes, it is also necessary to read the statute authorizing <br />the particular national park. On the other hand, wilderness <br />areas and wild and scenic rivers are simply designated for <br />addition to the National Wilderness Preservation System or <br />National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. The purpose of <br />those reservations is as stated in the Wilderness and Wild <br />and Scenic Rivers Acts, respectively. Recently, Congress has <br />begun to include language regarding water, and in those <br />instances, it is also necessary to consider that language. <br />Wilderness Areas <br />The primary purpose of wilderness areas is to secure for <br />the American people of present and future generations the <br />benefits of an enduring resource of wilderness. For this <br />purpose, there is hereby established a National Wilderness <br />Preservation System and these shall be administered for the <br />use and enjoyment of the American people in such manner <br />as will leave them unimpaired for future use and enjoyment <br />19