My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8000
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:31:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8000
Author
Werth, L. F., et al.
Title
Developing a Geographic Information System for Resources Monitoring on the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
R-93-20,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
completed, all point, line, and polygon data are attributed. A quality check is performed on <br />the attributed master coverage by plotting the line work and attribute labels to a hard copy. <br />The hard copy plot is then quality checked by cross referencing it with the original <br />classification mylar. <br />At this time, the master coverage is segregated by attribute into separate coverages and <br />placed into the previously mentioned directory structure. Data sets currently being developed <br />by the Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Section for the GCES/GIS and the <br />directories they reside in can be seen in appendix D. A sample plot of the data set generated <br />for site No. 4 can be seen on figure 11 as a foldout at the back of this report. <br />A concern about the quality of the initial base surveying was identified during the fall of <br />1991. A NPS geodist notified GCES that the maps for site No. 5 may fall short of National <br />Map Accuracy Standards because of a horizontal and vertical error found in the control points <br />used to produce the maps. <br />To assess the level of quality, the maps for sites No. 1, 2, and 5 were checked to see if they <br />met National Map Accuracy Standards. The easting (x) and northing (y) accuracy of points <br />used to produce the base maps were checked by GPS and conventional surveying. A team <br />from the APO (Arizona Projects Office) resurveyed the control points on the rim and the <br />points down on the canyon bottom. APO ran an open traverse from GPS points at the <br />beginning and end of each monitoring site. They also completed a vertical profile from some <br />of the control points to river's edge. The accuracy of the control points was well within the <br />tolerance to compile topographic maps with a 1-meter contour accuracy. Upon completion of <br />the analysis, the maps were determined to be within National Map Accuracy Standards. A <br />random topographic check using cross sectional surveying techniques is being performed by <br />the GCES survey crew on monitoring sites No. 3 and 6 through 15. <br />DISCUSSION <br />Long-Term Monitoring <br />To achieve the goals defined by the NRC (National Research Council) (1987), the GCES <br />enlisted the expertise of Reclamation's Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Section <br />in the development of a GIS data base to be used in the long-term monitoring of the Grand <br />Canyon. "If a management plan is to be developed for the Glen Canyon Dam, the plan <br />should be integrated with and based upon a sound understanding of the effects of operations <br />on environmental resources. The predictions of effects should be viewed as working <br />hypotheses about river processes; these hypotheses can be tested by use of monitoring data." <br />(NRC, 1987) <br />18
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.