My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7997
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:30:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7997
Author
Nash, L. L. and P. H. Gleick.
Title
The Colorado River Basin and Climatic Change, The Sensitivity of Streamflow and Water Supply to Variations in Temperature and Precipitation.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
EPA 230-R-93-009,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />change scenarios result in distributions of annual streamflow that are roughly log-normal (Figures 4-5). <br /> <br /> <br />Temperature increases cause annual flows to decrease and to consolidate, i.e. the distribution narrows, and <br /> <br /> <br />low-flow years become more frequent. Precipitation increases of 20% spread the distribution at the upper <br /> <br />end. This result is also evident in the coefficient of variation, which increases in most of the scenarios that <br /> <br /> <br />incorporate a 20% precipitation increase (Tables 5-8). The implication is that increased flows are likely to <br /> <br /> <br />increase variability on an annual basis. <br /> <br />The statistical significance of these results was estimated following the method used by K1emes <br /> <br /> <br />(1985: App. B). For each scenario, the mean and standard deviation ~,(1) of the annual streamflow series <br /> <br />were treated as perfect estimates of the true mean and standard deviation for the distribution of annual <br /> <br /> <br />flows. Subsequently, 125 series of 35-year flows were randomly generated from a log-normal distribution <br /> <br />defined by J.' and u. The mean and standard deviation of each 35-year series were then plotted (u versus <br /> <br />J.'), and the 90% confidence region was defined to be the ellipse that contained 90% of these points. These <br /> <br /> <br />confidence regions are illustrated for the White River model in Figure 6. <br /> <br />Using the above method, only three scenarios were significant for all basins at the 90% <br />confidence level: T + 4' C. P-20%; T + 4' C, P-10%; and T + 2' C, P-20%. For the White River, one additional <br />scenario, T + 2' C and P + 20%, was also significant. None of the GCM scenarios were significant at the 90% <br />level. The statistically significant scenarios correspond to a minimum change in mean annual streamflow <br />of 18% on the White River, 25% on the East River and 22% on the Animas River (Nash and Gleick, 1991). <br /> <br />Seasonal Runoff <br /> <br /> <br />Temperature increases cause peak runoff to occur earlier in the year. A temperature increase <br /> <br />of 2' C shifts peak runoff from June to May for the White and Animas rivers. For the East River, peak runoff <br /> <br />still occurs in June, although it is not nearly so exaggerated. For all three basins, the 2' C rise creates a <br /> <br />double peak, with high runoff occurring in both May and June. When temperature is increased by 4' C, the <br /> <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.