My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7997
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:30:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7997
Author
Nash, L. L. and P. H. Gleick.
Title
The Colorado River Basin and Climatic Change, The Sensitivity of Streamflow and Water Supply to Variations in Temperature and Precipitation.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
EPA 230-R-93-009,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />were applied as absolutes (i.e. + ~ C), while changes in precipitation were applied as percentages (i.e. + 10% <br />of precipitation in the base case).9 <br /> <br />RESULTS OF HYDROLOGIC MODELING <br /> <br />Annual Runoff <br /> <br />For the three Colorado River sub-basins, the magnitude of changes in mean annual runoff <br /> <br />induced by the hypothetical scenarios ranged from decreases of 33% to increases of 19%. The greatest <br /> <br />decrease in runoff was seen in the East River for a ~ C increase in temperature in conjunction with a 20% <br /> <br />decrease in precipitation. The greatest increase was seen in the White River basin when a ~ C increase was <br /> <br />combined with a 20% increase in precipitation. In all cases, at least a 10% increase in precipitation was <br /> <br />required to offset the effect on annual runoff of a ~ C temperature rise. A 20% increase in precipitation <br /> <br />caused runoff to increase in every case. For the Two-elevation moclel, mean annual runoff decreased by <br /> <br />12% and 21 % when the respective hypothetical scenarios of T + ~ C and T + ~ C were applied with no change <br /> <br />in precipitation. Tables 5 through 8 show these results. In general, the Two-elevation moclel was more <br /> <br />sensitive to increases in temperature than the three sub-basin moclels. While this may be an artifact of the <br /> <br />Two-elevation moclel itself, it may also be explained by the increased importance of evaporation in the lower <br /> <br />elevation zones that the model encompasses. <br /> <br />For the Animas and East rivers, all GCM scenarios led to decreases in runoff, ranging from -8% <br /> <br />to -20%, which reflects the dominant effect of increased evaporation. For the White River, two out of the <br /> <br />four GCM scenarios showed increases in runoff (of 10% to 12%), while the other two scenarios resulted in <br /> <br />9 Mean monthly changes (rather than mean annual changes) cannot be used in the NWSRFS without <br />moclifications to the moclel. All historical temperature and precipitation data are stored in data files that are <br />called upon by the calibration program. The program then normalizes these data for the basin being <br />mocleled using a single coefficient. Mean annual temperature and precipitation data can therefore be easily <br />moclified by altering these coefficients. In order to incorporate monthly changes, however, it would be <br />necessary to alter the data associated with particular months by different amounts. While this can be done, <br />it requires access to the actual program files, which were not available for this study. <br /> <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.